|
It was reported that, during surgery, one (1) evos large {} tgtr 2.5mm drill w/ao qc broke off during drilling.Drill bit was stuck in proximal femoral bone.Only one of the three drill bits was successfully retrieved.The others are retained in the patient.The procedure was performed, after a non-significant delay, with a s+n back-up device.Patient was not injured as consequence of this problem.
|
|
It was reported that, during surgery, one (1) evos large {} tgtr 2.5mm drill w/ao qc broke off during drilling.Drill bit was stuck in proximal femoral bone.The procedure was performed, after a non-significant delay, with a s+n back-up device.Patient was not injured as consequence of this problem.
|
|
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, based on the limited information provided, the root cause of the reported drill tip breakages could not be definitively concluded.The retained drill tips are non-implantable, and they are comprised of stainless steel, they are manufactured and intended as externally communicating devices and are not approved for long term internal tissue exposure and long-term implantation data is not available.According to the reported the surgeon was able to remove only one 3.7mm drill tip.However, one evos large tgtr 3.7mm r drill tip was retained in the distal femur and one evos large tgtr 2.5mm drill w/ao qc tip was retained proximal femur.Since it was reported the tips were retained in hard bone, micro-motion and/or migration of the retained drill bits is unlikely, even though, we cannot make any conclusions on the impact of the non-implantable foreign bodies to the patient as we cannot confirm the location of the retained portion of the drill tips.However, it was reported the patient was not injured as consequence of this problem.Per report, the surgeon completed the procedure with a smith & nephew back-up device.The impact to the patient beyond the reported retained drill bits, the non-significant surgical extension could not be determined.Device batch number was not provided, thus, an evaluation of the manufacturing records could not be performed.A review of complaint history for the previous 12 months did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for care, maintenance, cleaning, and sterilization of smith & nephew orthopedics devices for single-use devices revealed that as the devices are sold both nonsterile and sterile and often removed from their original packaging to be placed in a containment device they should be cleaned and/or inspected prior to sterilization.The device should not be reprocessed or reused if comes in contact with blood, tissue or bodily fluids.Reuse may increase the risk of breakage, failure, patient infection, patient injury and revision surgery.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.This is a single use device, surgical technique or damage from misuse are likely potential factors that could contribute to the reported event.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
|
It was reported that, during surgery, two (2) evos large tgtr 3.7mm r drill broke even with use of targeted drill guide.Drill bits broke when was being used to drill pilot hole in distal femur of patient.Additionally, one (1) evos large {} tgtr 2.5mm drill w/ao qc broke off during drilling, and the drill bit was stuck in proximal femoral bone.Only one drill bit from the one evos large tgtr 3.7mm r drill was successfully retrieved.The other 2 drill bits were retained in the patient.Patient received a retro nail size 13x22 and a 14hole peri pros distal femur plate.The procedure was resumed, after a non-significant delay, with a s+n back-up device.Patient was not injured as consequence of this problem.
|