• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM 4MAX REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM 4MAX REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 4MAXC
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/08/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure using a penumbra system 4max reperfusion catheter (4maxc).During the procedure, the physician experienced resistance while advancing the 4maxc towards the target vessel.After reaching the target vessel, the physician attempted to aspirate using the 4maxc, but no thrombus was aspirated.The physician then visualized under fluoroscopy that the 4maxc was fractured.Therefore, the 4maxc was removed.Upon removal, the physician confirmed that the 4maxc was fractured but remained connected by the inner wires.No additional information was provided regarding the completion of the procedure.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned 4maxc confirmed a fracture on the catheter shaft.If the 4maxc is advanced against resistance, damage such as a kink and subsequent fracture may occur.Based on the reported event, the root cause of the resistance could not be determined.Further evaluation of the device revealed kinks on the catheter shaft.Based on the reported event, this damage was incidental to the complaint.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM 4MAX REPERFUSION CATHETER
Common Device Name
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key17243081
Report Number3005168196-2023-00312
Device Sequence Number14767429
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00814548012414
UDI-Public814548012414
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K160449
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/10/2023
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/15/2024
Device Catalogue Number4MAXC
Device Lot NumberF111485
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/23/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/06/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/29/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/30/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/10/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/16/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexMale
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-