• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MI1000 MED-EL CONCERT PIN
Medical Device Problem Code Impedance Problem (2950)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Failure of Implant (1924)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been explanted.If it should be explanted, it should be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a follow up report.
 
Event or Problem Description
The user's hearing performance with the device is affected.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: based on the received information, a damage to the active electrode due to excessive mechanical stress appears very likely.However to determine an exact root cause device investigation would be necessary.Re-implantation is considered but no date has been scheduled yet.
 
Event or Problem Description
The user's hearing performance with the device is affected.The family does not know if an accident or trauma has occurred.They also don't know when the user stopped hearing with the device and if it was a sudden stop or a gradual decrease in hearing.A medical intervention is considered, but the re-implantation is not scheduled yet.
 
Event or Problem Description
The user's hearing performance with the device was affected.The family did not know if an accident or trauma had occurred.They also didn't know when the user stopped hearing with the device and if it was a sudden stop or a gradual decrease in hearing.The user has been re-implanted on (b)(6) 2023.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: overload fractures in the active electrode which are consistent with an external mechanical impact were determined to be the root cause of device failure.The problems given in the recipient report appear to match the damage found.This is a final report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Common Device Name
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH
innsbruck
AU 
Manufacturer Contact
laura simonotti
fuerstenweg 77a
innsbruck 6020
AU   6020
57788
MDR Report Key17245641
Report Number9710014-2023-00554
Device Sequence Number6831310
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier09008737062712
UDI-Public(01)09008737062712
Combination Product (Y/N)N
PMA/510(K) Number
P000025
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2019
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/02/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date06/04/2022
Device Model NumberMI1000 MED-EL CONCERT PIN
Device Catalogue Number07678
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/26/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/26/2023
06/26/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/03/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/08/2023
02/02/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/04/2019
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age7 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-