MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

Model Number	DFW150
Medical Device Problem Code	Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code	Visual Impairment (2138)
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It is reported that the patient had residual refractive error with dfw150u225 lens and doctor was planning to replace with another synergy lens.Additional information received revealed that the surgeon cut the lens into 3 pieces to remove and no widening of the incision or sutures were used.No other information is available.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d6a: if implanted, give date: unknown, information not provided.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: unknown, information not provided.Section h3: other 81: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d-9: device available for evaluation? yes, section d-9: device date returned to manufacturer: 07-july-2023, section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed, that the complaint lens was received cut in half.And had a detached haptic.The lens was cleaned and no issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issue could be identified.The complaint issues were not confirmed.The other observed issues, during the product evaluation could not be confirmed, to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.The complaint issue reported could not be confirmed.And no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.

• Brand Name: TECNIS IOL
• Common Device Name: LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
• Manufacturer (Section D): AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.; road 402 north, anasco ind. pk; anasco PR 00610
• Manufacturer Contact: somyata nagpal ; 31 technology drive; irvine, CA 92618 ; 7142478552
• MDR Report Key: 17251107
• Report Number: 3012236936-2023-01673
• Device Sequence Number: 6898338
• Product Code: MFK
• UDI-Device Identifier: 05050474751316
• UDI-Public: (01)05050474751316(17)241105
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: CA
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: P980040
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Serviced by Third Party (Y/N): Unknown
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Physician
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 08/22/2023

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 11/05/2024
• Device Model Number: DFW150
• Device Catalogue Number: DFW150U225
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: Device Returned to Manufacturer
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: Yes
• Was the Report Sent to FDA?: No
• Type of Report(Section G): Thirty-Day
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 06/08/2023
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 07/27/2023
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 07/03/2023
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 08/22/2023
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Yes
• Date Device Manufactured: 11/05/2021
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Required Intervention
• Patient Sex: Unknown