| Model Number |
IPN917235 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/09/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Qn#(b)(4),n/a, other remarks: n/a, corrected data: n/a.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that "the first injection of contrast agent was done without problem.However, the catheter got torn when the contrast agent was injected for the second time.The user completed the procedure.No health consequence to the patient was reported".The catheter was torn near the hub.Mechanical injection was used to complete the procedure.The contrast agent used was lohexol 350 at an injection rate of 8cc/sec and an injection pressure of 590 psi which is greater than specified in the ifu.No patient harm or injury.The patient status is reported as "fine".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Qn# (b)(4).The product was not returned for investigation.According to the product complaint form, the injection pressure used for the contrast media injection was 590 psi, which indicates that the user did not follow the instruction for use (ifu)/product specification sheet for the contrast media injection.The instruction for use (ifu) states in the "warning and precautions" section: "5.Warning: when injecting radiopaque media, do not exceed the maximum flow rate and pressure as indicated on the separate instruction insert." the product specification sheet states: the "maximum safe pressure" for the contrast media injection is "540 psig".A device history record (dhr) review was conducted for the lot number with no relevant findings.The device passed all manufacturing specifications prior to release.The reported complaint that the "catheter got torn when the contrast agent was injected for the second time" is not able to be confirmed.The product was not returned for investigation.Additionally, the injection pressure used for the contrast media injection was 590 psi , which indicates that the user did not follow the instruction for use (ifu)/product specification sheet for the contrast media injection.As a result, an in-service has been requested to review the instructions for use (ifu)/product specification sheet with the customer.Based on a review of the device history record (dhr) , the product met specification upon release.The root cause of the complaint is undetermined.The reported complaint will be monitored for any developing trends.If the product is returned at a later date, a full investigation of the sample will be completed.Other remarks: n/a; corrected data: n/a.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that "the first injection of contrast agent was done without problem.However, the catheter got torn when the contrast agent was injected for the second time.The user completed the procedure.No health consequence to the patient was reported".The catheter was torn near the hub.Mechanical injection was used to complete the procedure.The contrast agent used was lohexol 350 at an injection rate of 8cc/sec and an injection pressure of 590 psi which is greater than specified in the ifu.No patient harm or injury.The patient status is reported as "fine.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Qn# (b)(4).The reported complaint that the "catheter got torn when the contrast agent was injected" was confirmed based upon the sample received.The customer returned a 5fr.80cm berman catheter with a portion of the original packaging lid-stock (inp-3, inp-5) for investigation.The sample was returned in the ups shipping box and was in a ziploc bag (inp-1, inp-2).Upon return, the catheter body was immediately noted ruptured near the junction hub; the body was noted ruptured from approximately 87.3cm to 87.8cm from the distal tip of the catheter (inp-8, inp-9).The inflation lumen stopcock was in the open position (inp-6).The recommended volume capacity of the balloon is 0.75cc (inp-6).The supplied control stroke syringe was not returned with the sample.Upon microscopic inspection, the balloon appeared typical; no damage or abnormalities were noted to the balloon (inp-7).No condensation was noted within the inflation lumen extension line.Dried contrast media was noted within the injection lumen extension line (inp-10).Dried contrast media was also noted on the exterior surfaces of the returned sample.No blood was noted on the interior or the exterior surfaces of the returned sample.No other damage or abnormalities were noted.As per the reported complaint information, the injection pressure used for the contrast media injection was 590 psi, which indicates that the user did not follow the instructions for use (ifu)/product specification sheet for the contrast media injection.The instructions for use (ifu) states in the "warning and precautions" section: "5.Warning: when injecting radiopaque media, do not exceed the maximum flow rate and pressure as indicated on the separate instruction insert." the product specification sheet states: the "maximum safe pressure" for the contrast media injection is "540 psig".The inflation lumen was injected with 0.75cc of air using a lab inventory control stroke syringe.The balloon inflated symmetrically (anp-1, anp-2).One side of the balloon measured approximately 4mm.The other side measured approximately 4mm.The balloon did meet specifications per graphic of radius ratio less than or equal to 2.0.The inflation lumen was injected with 0.75cc of air using a lab inventory control stroke syringe.The balloon inflated symmetrically (anp-1, anp-2).The balloon deflated in less than 3 seconds when the syringe was removed per specification.No pull away was noted after the tug test.The balloon was placed in water and air was injected into the inflation lumen again.No leak was noted.The ruptured catheter body did not result in damage to the inflation lumen.The catheter's injection lumen was aspirated/flushed, and air was noted leaking from the ruptured catheter body (anp-3).Based on a review of the device history record (dhr), the product met specification upon release; however, the specifications were not met during the complaint investigation due to the ruptured catheter body.The probable root cause of the complaint was manufacturing related.Capa has been initiated under teleflex's quality system by the manufacturing site for this issue.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend for reports of this nature.Other remarks: n/a; corrected data: n/a.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that "the first injection of contrast agent was done without problem.However, the catheter got torn when the contrast agent was injected for the second time.The user completed the procedure.No health consequence to the patient was reported".The catheter was torn near the hub.Mechanical injection was used to complete the procedure.The contrast agent used was lohexol 350 at an injection rate of 8cc/sec and an injection pressure of 590 psi which is greater than specified in the ifu.No patient harm or injury.The patient status is reported as "fine".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|