|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a lesion in the coronary artery.The 5.0x8mm nc trek balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) was used and attempted to be retrieved; however, it was not possible to withdraw as the balloon was partially deflated, failed to refold and had a winged appearance despite several attempts to hold negative pressure.On the second attempt, the balloon was noted to be ruptured due the force applied; therefore, the bdc was removed with the guidewire and the guiding catheter.There were no adverse patient effects and there was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Visual and functional inspections were performed on the returned device.The reported failure to fold and separation were confirmed.The reported difficulty removing the device and deflation issue could not be replicated in a testing environment due to the condition of the returned device.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents and/or complaints from this lot.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported deflation issue; however, the reported failure to fold and difficulty removing the device appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.The reported separation appears to be related to user error/operational context.Possible factors that may contribute to difficulty deflating the balloon include, but are not limited to, deflation technique, tortuous anatomy, loose connection with the indeflator, contamination in the inflation lumen or damage to the guide wire and/or inflation lumen.A conclusive cause for the reported deflation issue could not be determined.In this case, it is likely that that a larger balloon size and/or deflation technique contributed to the reported failure to fold (winged balloon).Additionally, the reported deflation issue and failure to fold likely contributed to the resistance met with the guiding catheter during removal since the balloon would not fully deflate and upon manipulation of the device and use of force, against resistance, the device ultimately separated.It was reported by the account that force was applied during the attempt to remove the device and the shaft separated.It should be noted that the coronary dilatation catheters (cdc), nc trek rx, global, instruction for use (ifu) states: if resistance is felt, determine the cause before proceeding.Continuing to advance or retract the catheter while under resistance may result in damage to the vessels and / or damage / separation of the catheter.In this case, it is likely that the violation of the ifu contributed to the reported separation as the device separated after pulling against resistance occurred.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.H6: the code 1546 was deleted and 1562 added.
|