• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RED72KIT
Medical Device Problem Codes Fracture (1260); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/19/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the m1 bifurcation segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system red 72 reperfusion catheter (red72), a velocity delivery microcatheter (velocity), a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max), and a guidewire.It was reported that the patient¿s anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, the physician completed one pass using the red72.While retracting the red72 to flush, the physician experienced resistance and the red72 fractured at the midshaft within the neuron max.Therefore, the neuron max containing the fractured red72 was removed from the patient.It was reported that the red72 was still connected by the coil winds of the catheter.The procedure was completed using a new red72, a new neuron max, and the same velocity.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned red72 confirmed that the catheter was fractured.If the red72 is retracted against resistance, damage such as a fracture may occur.It was reported that the patient¿s anatomy was tortuous.This likely contributed to the resistance during the procedure.Further evaluation revealed a kink on the catheter shaft.This damage was incidental to the reported complaint and may have occurred during packaging of the device for return to penumbra.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Common Device Name
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key17326522
Report Number3005168196-2023-00334
Device Sequence Number12426782
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948023932
UDI-Public815948023932
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateLA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K211654
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/11/2023
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/13/2026
Device Catalogue NumberRED72KIT
Device Lot NumberH00002170
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/21/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/03/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/14/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/11/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/14/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age82 YR
Patient SexFemale
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-