| Model Number |
M0035473060 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Neuropathy (1983); Cerebral Edema (4403)
|
| Date of Event |
05/23/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This is the 3 of 3 mdrs h3 other text : the device remains implanted inside the patient's vasculature.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an endovascular procedure for a ruptured aneurysm, physician used the subject coil and flow diverting stent to treat the patient.Post procedure on (b)(6) 2023, patient was readmitted due to fine motor disturbance of right hand since (b)(6), facialis weakness on right hand.Multifocal subcortical edema was notice in the ct (computed tomography) and mri (magnetic resonance imaging).According the physician it is caused by contact allergy (new) type iv to nickel + cobalt.No additional information available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an endovascular procedure for a ruptured aneurysm, physician used the subject coil and flow diverting stent to treat the patient.Post procedure on (b)(6) 2023 patient was readmitted due to fine motor disturbance of right hand since (b)(6) 2023.Facialis weakness on right hand.Multifocal subcortical edema was notice in the ct (computed tomography) and mri (magnetic resonance imaging).According the physician it is caused by contact allergy (new) type iv to nickel + cobalt.No additional information available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This is the 3 of 3 mdrs.H4 manufacturing date ¿ added.D4 expiration date ¿ added.Due to the automated manufacturing execution system (mes) there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.The subject device is not available; therefore, functional testing as well as visual testing cannot be performed.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported complaint could not be confirmed, and it could not be definitively determined if the device failed to meet specifications because the product was not returned.Based upon medical review, the harm observed in this complaint is anticipated in nature as per the device risk assessment.As a product related root cause does not apply and the issue is due to a known physiological effect of the procedure and/or patient condition noted within the dfu, product labeling and/or risk documentation files, an assignable cause of anticipated procedural complication will be assigned to this complaint of patient complications and patient neurological deficit.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|