|
Review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There has been 1 other similar events for the reported lot that relate to the same device/patient, an evaluation of the device cannot be performed as the device was not returned to the manufacturer.Should additional information become available it will be reported in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.The following devices were also listed in this report: cat# 5571-s-050; triathlon stem extender 50mm; lot# hv62wx.Cat# 6704-0-510; md vit slv and 2.0mm homog cbl; lot# 79542302.Cat# 5512-f-402 tri ts femur sz4 right; lot# go93h.Cat# 5560-s-312; triathlon cemented stem-12mm x 150mm; lot# 0080703e.Cat# 5542-a-402 triathlon femoral distal augment 15mm - size 4 right; lot# byz4t.Cat # 5549-a-642; triathlonctrfemconeaug sz3&4r; lot# km3m.Cat# 5542-a-402; triathlon femoral distal augment 15mm - size 4 right: lot# wgw3.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.H3 other text : not returned to the manufacturer.
|
|
Correction: d4, g4, h4:catalog number and lot code was updated after initial mdr was submitted: an event regarding infection involving a triathlon insert was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional, and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.-clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: "conclusion/assessment: the records were not entirely complete, and no dated or sequential radiographs were provided for review.The patient had a primary knee performed and just over 6 months later had an arthroscopy for the it band and patellar tilt.The records gapped until 2012, when after having pain, the patient had a revision for a loose femur.She did well initially, but 1 ½ years later was seen for pain and instability and ultimately underwent an arthroscopy after an aspiration showed metal stained fluid.She then underwent revision of the femur, and it was found that she had broken the femoral stem at the junction with the threads.It was commented that the failure could represent corrosion.The revision became infected and she underwent a wash out and polyethylene exchange 6 months later.No records were provided for the later claims of another extensor mechanism disruption and revision and/or two stage revision thereafter.No additional materials were presented for review.Event confirmation: two arthroscopy procedures can be confirmed.A revision for a loose femur can be confirmed.A second revision for a loose femur and fracture of a femoral stem can be confirmed.The reason for the stem fracture cannot be confirmed.The two staged revision to competitor components cannot be confirmed.Root cause: the root cause for arthroscopy #1 was anterior knee pain, it band tendonitis and patellar tilt.The cause of the first femoral revision was loosening but a root cause cannot be attributed.The root cause of the second arthroscopy was pain and swelling and presence of metallic debris in aspirated fluid.The root cause of the metal stained fluid was motion at a fractured femoral stem.The root cause of the second revision was femoral loosening and a fractured femoral stem.The root cause of the stem fracture cannot be determined.The root cause of the last procedure, wash out and polyethylene revision, was infection.The root cause of the two stage revision which was not documented would presumed to be infection." -product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot or sterile lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to infection.All stryker products sold as sterile are validated to a minimum sterility assurance level sal of 10^-6 in accordance with applicable iso standards.A review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant was unable to confirm the infection event as no medical records pertaining to the 2-stage infection case were provided.Further information such as pathology reports and the revision operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.This patient has a long history of prior revisions, infections, and medical interventions in addition to a bmi in the morbidly obese range and elevated a1c.These patient factors may have contributed to the reported infection event as the medical records indicated these factors would generally exclude the patient from being a surgical candidate.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.The following devices were also listed in this report: cat# 5571-s-050; triathlon stem extender 50mm; lot# hv62wx.Cat# 6704-0-510; md vit slv and 2.0mm homog cbl; lot# 79542302.Cat# 5512-f-402 tri ts femur sz4 right; lot# go93h.Cat# 5560-s-312; triathlon cemented stem-12mm x 150mm; lot# 0080703e.Cat# 5542-a-402 triathlon femoral distal augment 15mm - size 4 right; lot# byz4t.Cat # 5549-a-642; triathlonctrfemconeaug sz3&4r; lot# km3m.Cat# 5542-a-402; triathlon femoral distal augment 15mm - size 4 right: lot# wgv3.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.
|