• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. GII PS HI FLEX ISRT SZ 7-8 13; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. GII PS HI FLEX ISRT SZ 7-8 13; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 71421524
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Failure of Implant (1924)
Date of Event 07/10/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, following a left tka surgery performed 15 years ago, the patient experienced an incident and noticed a "difference in the knee".X-rays revealed potential breakage of the ps articular insert.A revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2023 to treat this adverse event.During this procedure, a synovectomy and debridement of the joint was performed.The broken hardware was confirmed and extracted, and cement debris from the postero-lateral compartment was also removed.Patient's current health status is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
B5, h3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation stated that, based on the information provided, it is unknown if the reported ¿incident¿ when the patient ¿felt a difference in his left knee¿ involved a traumatic event to the left total knee arthroplasty after approximately 15 years in vivo; however, the findings of the broken post tip along with noted cement debris would correlate with an injury, but this cannot be definitively concluded.The patient impact included the fractured post with cement debris in the knee joint and the subsequent insert revision/synovectomy/debridement with removal of post tip and debris.Further patient impact cannot be determined, although a transient recovery phase would be anticipated.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee systems revealed that the implant can break or become damaged as a result of strenuous activity or trauma.The patient should be warned that the device does not replace normal healthy bone.This has been identified as a warning and precaution.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include abnormal loading of limb, excessive forces and/or traumatic injury.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, following a left tka surgery performed 15 years ago, the patient experienced an incident and noticed a "difference in the knee".X-rays revealed potential breakage of the ps articular insert.A revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2023 to treat this adverse event.During this procedure, a synovectomy and debridement of the joint was performed.The broken hardware was confirmed and extracted, and cement debris from the postero-lateral compartment was also removed.Patient's current health status is good.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GII PS HI FLEX ISRT SZ 7-8 13
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key17347286
Report Number1020279-2023-01454
Device Sequence Number6091467
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier03596010492999
UDI-Public03596010492999
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountrySF
PMA/510(K) Number
K032295
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Explanted Year2023
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/25/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/24/2019
Device Model Number71421524
Device Catalogue Number71421524
Device Lot Number09AM19739
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/11/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/23/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/18/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/25/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/26/2009
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
Patient Weight128 KG
-
-