|
Section a2, a4 and a5: per regulation eu (b)(4) (general data protection regulation), patient identifiers were not collected or recorded and therefore are not available.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section e1: email address: unknown/not provided, as information was asked but it was not provided.Section e1 - telephone number: (b)(6).Device evaluation: product testing could not be performed since the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, the reported issue could not be verified, and product quality deficiency could not be determined.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search of complaints related to this production order (po) was performed.The search revealed that no additional complaints were received for this po.No escalation required.Conclusion: a product deficiency has not been identified; therefore, no additional corrective actions have been initiated.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
It was reported that the intraocular lens (iol) was implanted following the explant for a non-jnj lens.During the implantation using the jamane technique, one haptic detached from the iol when it was pulled through the conjunctiva.During the attempt of removing the iol, the other haptic also detached from the iol.The iol and both haptics were explanted from the eye and replaced by the standby lens without incident.There was a delay of 15 minutes and an unplanned vitrectomy was performed.No further details were provided.
|