• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number ZA9003
Medical Device Problem Code Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section b3: date of event: the exact date is unknown.The best estimate is between the implant and explant dates, oct 6, 2014 through jul 10, 2023.Section h3-other (81): the device has not been returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Section h6: health effect - clinical code: code 4581 is to capture device decentered or dislocated or tilted subluxated or wrong position.An attempt was made to get the missing information.However, the customer indicated no more information is available.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported the johnson and johnson (jnj) intraocular lens (iol) dislocated post implantation.The iol was explanted from the patient¿s left eye.An unplanned vitrectomy was required.The replacement lens is the same model but a different diopter, model za9003 22.5 diopter.Reportedly, the patient has fully recovered.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: aug 14, 2023.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received inside of a lens case (sn scratched off).No additional materials were received.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received cut in half and with a bent haptic.The lens was cleaned and, no further issues could be identified.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key17356500
Report Number3012236936-2023-01818
Device Sequence Number5091227
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474529045
UDI-Public(01)05050474529045(17)190814
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P990080
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2014
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/01/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/14/2019
Device Model NumberZA9003
Device Catalogue NumberZA90030215
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/12/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/25/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/19/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/01/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/14/2014
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-