• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 LEONARD CV CATHETER, DUAL-LUMEN, 10 F; CHRONIC CATHETERS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 LEONARD CV CATHETER, DUAL-LUMEN, 10 F; CHRONIC CATHETERS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0600630
Medical Device Problem Codes Fracture (1260); Material Separation (1562)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/28/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 11/2026).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that one month and thirteen days post a chronic catheter placement, the white lumen allegedly broke.Reportedly, the lumen was removed and replaced.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one d/l catheter loaded to a leonard s/l catheter was received for evaluation.Visual, microscopic, tactile and functional evaluations were performed.Therefore, the investigation is unconfirmed for the reported fracture issue as no evidence of fracture was noted in the catheter.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiry date: 11/2026).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that one month and thirteen days post a chronic catheter placement, the white lumen allegedly broke.Reportedly, the lumen was removed and replaced.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that one month and thirteen days post a chronic catheter placement, the white lumen allegedly broke.Reportedly, the lumen was removed and replaced.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one d/l extension set loaded to a leonard d/l catheter extension leg segment were returned for evaluation.Visual, microscopic, tactile and functional evaluations were performed on the returned device.A complete compound break was noted at the distal end of the leonard d/l catheter and the edges of the compound break were noted to be uneven.The distal catheter segment was not returned.Therefore the investigation is confirmed for the reported fracture and the identified material separation issues.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiry date: 11/2026), g3, h6 (device) h11: h6 (result, conclusion) h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEONARD CV CATHETER, DUAL-LUMEN, 10 F
Common Device Name
CHRONIC CATHETERS
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED -3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key17376930
Report Number3006260740-2023-03124
Device Sequence Number12433642
Product Code LJS
UDI-Device Identifier00801741051944
UDI-Public(01)00801741051944
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateKY
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K830233
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/18/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number0600630
Device Lot NumberHUGV0117
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/28/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/11/2023
04/15/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/24/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/13/2023
04/24/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-