|
|
| Model Number |
DIU300 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
07/12/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as there was no patient contact.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as there was no patient contact.Section h3-other (81): the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts were made to obtain more information about the event; however, no additional information has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that prior to inserting the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) in the eye, the surgeon noticed that the haptic was folded under the lens.There was no patient contact.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product was received for evaluation.Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: aug 15, 2023.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint handpiece was received with the lens stuck inside of the cartridge.The lens could be observed to be rotated counterclockwise approximately 90 degrees.The cartridge tip could be observed to be damaged as well; however, the damage is consistent with a handpiece damaged during shipping.The handpiece was disassembled and the assembly was inspected, no issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issue could be identified.The lens was removed from the cartridge and cleaned, revealing that the lens had a chipped spare tire.No further issues could be observed.The complaint issue ¿haptic damage¿ was not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: as per complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.The complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|