|
(b)(4).Date sent: 7/24/2023.D4 batch #: unknown.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: 1.Where was the tumor location? the ablations form in edc says this was in segment viii, but please confirm.It is confirmed that the tumor was located in segment viii.2.What was the probe insertion approach? probe was placed using ct guidance and adequate placement was confirmed with non-con ct.3.Was any hydro dissection technique used? the ablation procedure form in edc says hydro dissection was not used, but please confirm.It is confirmed that no hydro dissection was used.4.When was the subcutaneous emphysema detected? se was detected immediately after tissue lock of probe and was confirmed with non-con ct (see more details from dr.(b)(6) above).5.Was there any device abnormality or issue identified on the probe after use? no obvious probe issues were observed at any time during testing or after the procedure (see more details from dr.(b)(6) above) 6.Was there any patient treatment? the ae form in edc says that no, intervention/treatment occurred, but please confirm.Confirmed there was no patient treatment indicated as this is not clinically significant and resolves on its own.I reviewed dr.'s response regarding the subcutaneous emphysema identified during the procedure for subject 215 and directly discussed it with him as well today, at the conversation at which you were present.He indicated that: 1.The microwave antenna tested as ¿normal¿, i.E.Functional without evident abnormalities in the liquid bath during the procedure just prior to insertion.The antenna was placed, without incident, under ct guidance.2.The subcutaneous gas (emphysema) was noted during the tissue-loc initiation.Dr.(b)(6) promptly stopped the tissue lock.3.That soft tissue emphysema led to no clinical consequences.Thus, he and i agree that this is a device malfunction, despite normal tabletop testing¿a malfunction that led to no clinical consequence to the patient.An analysis of the product could not be performed since a physical sample was not received for evaluation.An evaluation of the manufacturing record could not be performed as the required product identification number was not provided to complete the evaluation.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|