|
It was reported that during a shoulder replacement surgery, while screwing into the trial handle, the treads of the tss head cutting template rod.2.5 device snapped inside the handle.The piece was retrieved out of the handle.The procedure was resumed, without any delay, using a s+n back-up device.Patient was not injured as consequence of this problem.
|
|
The associated device was returned and evaluated.Visual evaluation of the tss head cutting template rod 2.5 found that the threaded tip of the tss head cutting template 2.5 was broken off, the reported event was confirmed.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history revealed similar events for the listed device over the previous 12 months, but no similar events for the batch based on the historical data, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.The tss head cutting template rod is a reusable instrument expected to be used across multiple surgeries.Per the surgical technique, the head cutting template handle version rod is used on the humeral trial inserter/extractor to set the stem in the correct anatomic retroversion.In this instance, the threaded tip of the head cutting rod is screwed into the tss trial inserter extractor, then the head cutting template rod is manipulated to rotate the inserter extractor.It is likely that the device contributed to the event due to wear from normal use.Potential causes for instrument breakage or damage include inadequate design and inadequate or incorrect surgical technique.According to similar previous investigations, the rod may have been broken tensile overload applied while engaging the rod.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|