|
SYNTHES GMBH TFNA FENESTRATED HELICAL BLADE 105MM - STERILE; ROD, FIXATION, INTRMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
04.038.405S |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
07/10/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from germany reports an event as follows: it was reported that underwent revision surgery on july 17, 2023, due to cut through of a trochanteric fixation nail advanced (tfna) blade.Patient was revised to a hip prosthesis.This report is for an unknown tfna helical blade.This is report 2 of 2 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthese is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthese has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthese or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthese, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: b3: date of event is an unknown date in 2023.D1, d2, d3, d4, g4 - 510k: this report is for an unknown tfna helical blade/unknown lot.Part and lot number are unknown; udi number is unknown.D9: complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.H3, h4, h6: without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Additional narrative: the photo was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device from the photo.Visual analysis of the photo revealed that the unk - nail head elements: tfna helical blade had migrated from original positioning.X-ray images shows a nail and blade construct at the proximal right femur with signs of an intertrochanteric fracture, review of the visual evidence could confirm that the blade had advanced medially and penetrating into the joint.The tang of the locking prong of the nail appears to be damaged and bent, this condition was consistent with exposure to unintended forces during extraction process, x-ray images do not indicate that the locking mechanism was a factor for the migration of the blade.While no root cause can be established for the reported event and as the fracture of the bone appears to be complex and unstable, a potential non-union fracture and/or early weight-bearing could have led to failure of the implant.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed for the unk - nail head elements: tfna helical blade.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.If information is obtained that was not available for this medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h6: the device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Dhr record review: a review of the device history record revealed no complaint related anomalies.The device history record shows this lot of tfna fenestraded helical sterile product was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations with no rework nor nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional, visual, and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.Part number: 04.038m405sp.Lot number: 854p955.Part manufacture date: 08-jun-2022.Manufacturing location: elmira.Part expiration date: n/a.Nonconformance noted: n/a.The product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that there was no damage or defects with the tfna helical blade perf l105 tan.The device has evidence of implanted and extraction process.However, review of the photo evidence could confirm that the blade had advanced medially and penetrating into the joint.A functional test was unable to be performed since it was not applicable to the complaint condition.A dimensional inspection was not performed as it is not applicable to the complaint condition.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the tfna helical blade perf l105 tan would contribute to the complained device issue.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.If information is obtained that was not available for this medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|