| Catalog Number |
ZILBS-635-8-8 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/19/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #k163018.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
User advanced the device through wire guide to porta hepatis , and adjust the device to the desired position, user released the stent around 2cm while found out the delivery system stuck which cannot release stent anymore.User then retracted the delivery system from patient and pick the stent which was broken into pieces from patient with forceps.User then changed to another same rpn stent to complete the procedure.(b)(4): distributor who submitted the compliant form confirmed the stent was detached from delivery system while user retracting the delivery system from patient.And distributor confirmed user picked all stent out of patient.This complaint was opened from complaint (b)(4) to capture the user error of the product not being inspected for kinks or damage before use and also the possibility that the delivery system was pushed during deployment.Related with (b)(4).No adverse effects reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) # k163018.Device evaluation:the device evaluation could not be completed as the zilbs-635-8-8 device of lot number c1903404 was returned for evaluation in its original packaging.The packaging was open on receipt.With the information provided, a physical examination and document-based investigation was conducted.This complaint is related to (b)(4).And captures the user error of not inspecting the device before use and the possibility that the delivery system was pushed during deployment.The device related to this occurrence underwent a laboratory evaluation on evaluation of the device the following was noted: visual inspection: - fractured stent and red safety tab returned separately.- stent observed to be in two pieces (please note: the fractured stent was returned in (b)(4).Pieces but one segment got entrapped in another during the decon process).- kink observed on outer sheath approx.10 cm from white distal tip.- second kink observed on inner catheter approx.2.5 cm from distal tip.- slight curvature observed on delivery system.Functional inspection.- device flushes as intended.- 0.035 wire guide will not pass through kink observed on inner catheter.Manufacturing records review.Prior to distribution all devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.Historical data review.The review of the relevant manufacturing records confirms the failure mode has not previously occurred for this work order.Instructions for use and label.It should be noted that the instructions for use (ifu0065) states the following: ¿upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred¿.There is evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use or label.Image review.An image was not returned for evaluation.Root cause analysis.A definitive root cause of user error was determined from the available information.As per the additional information asked, the user has stated that the device was not inspected before use.The instructions for use states that the product is to be inspected before use for any damage.The user has not complied with the requirements of the ifu with respect to the intended use of the device.User/use error complaints are considered foreseen misuse.If any damage was on the device prior to use either through the device becoming damaged during transportation or storage or becoming damaged during removal from the packaging, it could result in the device failing to function correctly inside the patient and could potentially lead to an extended procedure time and could increase the potential for harm to the patient.It should be noted that, as the device was used outside of their validated state and/or against the instructions provided in the ifu, it is not possible to predict how the devices will perform or function.The user was asked to confirm whether the delivery system was pushed during deployment.They had originally stated that it had but upon request for confirmation of this, they confirmed that it was not pushed during deployment.Confirmation of complaint.Complaint is confirmed based on customer and/or rep testimony.Summary of investigation.According to the initial reporter, the user advanced the device through wire guide to porta hepatis , and adjust the device to the desired position, user released the stent around 2cm while found out the delivery system stuck which cannot release stent anymore.User then retracted the delivery system from patient and pick the stent which was broken into pieces from patient with forceps.User then changed to another same rpn stent to complete the procedure.Distributor who submitted the compliant form confirmed the stent was detached from delivery system while user retracting the delivery system from patient.And distributor confirmed user picked all stent out of patient.This complaint was opened from complaint(b)(4).To capture the user error of the product not being inspected for kinks or damage before use and also the possibility that the delivery system was pushed during deployment.The procedure was completed with another device of the same rpn, within the same operating procedure.Investigation findings conclude a definitive root cause of user error was determined from the available information.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Supplemental report is being submitted due to the completion of the investigation on 31-jan-2024.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|