|
Clearcorrect findings: the clinician submitted an x-ray of the affected tooth which was taken on (b)(6) 2023.The patient exhibits signs of gum recession and tooth 26 (fdi) appears to be discolored compared to the rest of the dentition based on the case start photos.The treatment plan shows no movement was planned for tooth 26; however, ipr was planned at step 1 between teeth 25-26.No treatment the phase 1 was shipped on (b)(6) 2023 and the manufacturing log shows no defects were detected and all manufacturing protocols were followed.Patient has ceased clear aligner treatment, and clinician stated an implant will be placed and patient will continue with traditional brackets.Clinical evaluation: the accompanying photographs and radiographs show an endodontically treated left maxillary first molar (26) with loss of periodontal attachment and discoloration.Additionally, there is moderate to severe wear of the occlusal table, a very deep bite and skeletal malocclusion.There is osseous ledging/bulbous alveolar ridge, worn incisal edges and cusp tips.These are signs of potential chronic bruxism.The history of endodontic treatment of tooth 26 and the loss of attachment compromise this tooth.The recommendation for endodontically treated teeth is for full crown coverage to avoid tooth fractures.In this case a crown was not on the tooth and the fracture more likely due to these factors than aligner wear.It is noted that this tooth was not actively moved in the aligner design.
|