|
|
| Catalog Number |
VCP947H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Wound Dehiscence (1154); Inflammation (1932); Pain (1994); Pocket Erosion (2013); Impaired Healing (2378); Fluid Discharge (2686)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).H6.Component code: g07002 - device not returned.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: was there any adverse consequence associated with the patient? (b)(6) 2023 ed with slightly red above where incision begins.No drainage initially expressed, but at the end of the visit drainage was expressed by palpation and antibiotic rx.No description of drainage documented by ed provider, rx clindamycin.(b)(6) 2023 patient c/o to moderate intermittently severe pain/discomfort near her lumbar surgical site.Incision is clean, dry, and intact.Sutures removed.(b)(6) 2023 small amount of pinkish/yellow drainage on dressing with occasional brownish drainage.Yellowish brown drainage on removed dressing.Small open area within the mid-porition of the surgical bed.Delayed wound healing and referred to wound care.(b)(6) 2023 serosanguineous drainage.Wound care "believe this in my professional opinion is once again the sutures that are meant to be dissolved but the body but inside the body rejects them and pushes them out causing dehiscence".Rx doxycycline.(b)(6) 2023 debridement of wound to sq.Level.(b)(6) 2023 spine: reports pain out of control and concern for possible infection referred to go to the ed.(b)(6) 2023 ed: no purulence and fluid collection in ct in sq.Level and documented as seroma.What is the current status of the patient? following with wound care for non-healing surgical wound.Was there any medical or surgical intervention performed (product removed; re-operation; re-suturing; re-closure; drainage)? if so, please specify.(b)(6) 2023 drainage.(b)(6) 2023 drainage pinkish/yellow/brownish.(b)(6) 2023 serosanguinous drainage.(b)(6) 2023 serosanguinous drainage.Debridement (b)(6) 2023, (b)(6) 2023.What was the appearance of the suture during the removal? unknown if sutures in the subcutaneous level (this is the level of the debridement) were removed as to no documentation stating, but wound care did document "there is slough present, erythema, sutures that have not dissolved present".If re-suture/re-closure was performed: sutures removed in post-op visit appointment (skin) (b)(6) 2023.Was reoperation necessary to remove the suture and re-close the wound? no.Was the suture trimmed in physician¿s office? no.Was the suture removed in a routine post-op procedure? no.Was the suture removed in a reoperation procedure? could you tell me if there was a prescription for steroids or antibiotics for the patient's recovery? if yes, please provide medication name, route and dose.(b)(6) 2023 doxycycline monohydrate 100mg tablet: 1 tablet q12hr for 10 days-oral.(b)(6) 2023 clindamycin 300mg capsule: take 1 capsule qid for 10 days-oral.What was the name of the procedure? posterior lumbar interbody fusion l-4-5 what was the procedure date? (b)(6) 2023.Please provide the lot number: unknown lot #.Supple number vcp269h suture vicryl 2-0 ct-2 & vcp947h suture vicryl plus 1.Event related to mw # 2210968-2023-05527, mw # 2210968-2023-05528 and mw # 2210968-2023-05529.This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.Trade name - irgacare®.Active ingredient(s) ¿ triclosan.Dosage form ¿ suture/solid/parenteral.Strength ¿ 472 g/m.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a posterior lumbar interbody fusion l-4-5 procedure on (b)(6) 2023 and suture was used.Post op the sutures were not dissolving and were being rejected.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #(b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: a2, a3, a4, b7 additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure 44f, 141.568kg, 52.What was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased) normal.For vicryl suture- how was the suture placed (interrupted or continuous)? running stich (continuous?) for vicryl suture - how was the suture originally tied (multiple knots, square knot, etc.)? unknown.For stratafix symmetric pds plus - was the fixation tab seated against the tissue at the initiation of suture use during the index procedure? n/a.For stratafix symmetric pds plus - were two reverse stitches performed across the incision prior to closure? n/a.What tissue layer(s) dehisced? subcutaneous.Did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? no documentation or report of issues.Other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? n/a.What is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? wound care provider, ""believe this in my professional opinion is once again the sutures that are meant to be dissolved but the body but inside the body rejects them and pushes them out causing dehiscence" corrected information: h6 type of investigation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|