|
It was reported that on (b)(6), 2023, the patient underwent an unknown surgery.During surgery, the forceps damaged during use.Forceps were damaged, even though they were not used many times.The forceps were purchased last year.The surgery was completed successfully with no surgical delay.It was determined through investigation that the device broke in two pieces.There are no pieces in the patient.The surgeon confirmed by x-ray.This report is for one reduction forceps w/serrated jaw-large handle-soft ratchet for (b)(4).
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: e1: initial reporter is j&j company representative.H3, h4, h6 investigation summary the product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the reduc-forceps toothed softlo l250 was found broken from the leaf spring.No other issues were found.A dimensional inspection was not performed as it is not applicable to the complaint condition. the observed condition of the device was consistent with a random component failure that may have been caused by exposure to unintended forces.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the reduc-forceps toothed softlo l250 would contribute to the complained device issue.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Drawing/specifications reviewed? yes, reviewed.Dimensional inspection: n/a.Device history part number: 399.124.Lot number: 318p699 (wo# 17701703).Manufacturing site: tuttlingen.Release to warehouse date: 09-aug-2021.A review of the device history records was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.The raw material certificate was reviewed and the used material was according to the specification of the device.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|