|
This report is being submitted to relay additional information and device evaluation.The following sections are being reported: b4: date of this report was updated.D9: device availability and return date were updated.G3: date received by manufacturer was updated.G6: type of report was updated.H2: type of follow up was updated.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer was updated.H6: type of investigation codes were added: 4109, 4111 and 3331.H6: investigation findings code was added: 213.H6: investigation conclusions code was added: 67.H10: narrative/data was updated.The reported healing abutment was returned for investigation.Visual evaluation of the as returned product identified no malfunction.During a functional test the abutment fit in-house mating implant as intended.Dhr review for the lot (1255851) revealed no deviations nor non-conformances which could have caused or contributed to the reported event.All products were conforming at the time they left zimvie.Lot was inspected and passed all acceptance criteria by qa.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot (1255851) and no similar event or complaint was found.Based on the investigation, risk management file review, and ifu, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation was incorrect technique used during placement.Therefore, based on the available information, device malfunction did not occur.However, the reported event was could not be verified.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the product was nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|