| Model Number |
DEN00V |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Inflammation (1932); Blurred Vision (2137); Visual Impairment (2138)
|
| Date of Event |
12/07/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section a4: patient weight: unknown; requested but not provided.This report is being submitted for a device involved in a masked clinical study; therefore, the following fields have been populated as unknown: section d4: model number: unknown section d4: serial number: unknown section d4: catalog number: a complete catalog number is unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Section d4: expiration date: unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Section d4: unique identifier (udi) number: unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Section h4: device manufacture date: unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Device evaluation: the device was not returned at the manufacturing site; therefore, product testing could not be performed, and the customer¿s reported complaint could not be verified.Manufacturing record review: no further investigation can be completed, as the serial number is unknown.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be confirmed.Attempts were made to obtain the missing information; however, no additional information has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that after the clinical study intraocular lens (iol) was implanted in the right eye, the patient mentioned severe cloudiness at the one week first follow-up visit.There were 0.5 cells noted in the anterior chamber.The site had performed optical coherence tomography (oct) and confirmed that the macula was normal.When the patient returned on an unscheduled visit on (b)(6) 2022, the visual acuity was 20/25 and no cells were seen in the anterior chamber.The patient still complained of visual symptoms.The site planned to bring the patient back for additional assessments in two weeks to determine if possible surgical intervention was necessary.The patient¿s left eye (second eye) cataract surgery had been postponed.Through follow up it was learned that the visual symptoms observed were moderate cloudy/hazy/filmy/foggy vision.The onset of symptoms were observed on (b)(6) 2022.The target refractive value pre-operative (pre-initial implant) was -0.09.Final refractive values post-operative (post-initial implant) were sphere: -00.75; cylinder: 00.75; axis: 125 at one month visit (b)(6) 2023, and sphere: -0.50; cylinder: 0.50; axis: 145 at an unscheduled visit (b)(6) 2023.The patient is returning for 6 month follow up on (b)(6)2023.There was no any additional surgical or medical intervention required at the time.Additional information was received reporting that the patient had the lens explanted on (b)(6) 2023.Another johnson and johnson lens was implanted as replacement (dxr00v, +21.5 diopter).There was no patient injury and no additional medical or surgical intervention was required.It was a routine surgery with no complications.The patient is really happy with the exchanged iol.The patient exited the study in (b)(6) 2023 and no additional data was collected for the study.No further information is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.The patient¿s date of birth was also received.Additional information: section b2: date of birth: (b)(6) 1954.Section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: oct 9, 2023.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the product is visually inspected under magnification by a qualified inspector.No anomalies where identified.The complaint issue reported could not be verified and no product deficiency could be identified.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information / corrected data: additional information was received for the product, which included the device model and serial number, as the clinical study was unmasked.The initial report was submitted under an unknown clinical study device.The clinical study has now been unmasked and upon learning the model of the lens (den00v), it was realized that this report was submitted for an investigational device that is not same or similar to a marketed device in the united states.Therefore, the section g4 pma number p980040 and the section d1 and d2 information that was provided in the initial filing is not applicable and the reported event is now determined not mdr reportable.No further information will be provided for this event under mdr number 3012236936-2023-02065.The following fields have been updated accordingly: section d3: establishment name: amo manufacturing netherlands.Section d3: other: netherlands.Section d3: address: (b)(6).Section d3: city: (b)(6).Section d3: state, province or territory: (b)(6).Section d3: postal office or zip code: (b)(6).Section d4: model number: den00v.Section d4: serial number: (b)(6).Section d4: catalog number: den00vu215.Section d4: expiration date: jun 27, 2025.Section d4: unique identifier (udi) number: (b)(4).Section h3: a review of the device history record and complaint history for production order for this device will be performed.Section h4: device manufacture date: jun 27, 2022.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|