|
|
| Catalog Number |
3504305M |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
|
| Date of Event |
07/25/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: deflation.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a female patient who underwent an unspecified breast surgery with a mentor exp rnd remote 400cc saline tissue expander experienced unknown sided deflation postoperative.As a result, patient underwent replacement with an unknown tissue expander on (b)(6) 2023.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information received on august 06, 2023 indicated that the patient identifier is (b)(6), date of event was on (b)(6) 2023, patient underwent unilateral replacement with cat:3549222/ sn: (b)(6), and patient left side was effected.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluation completed on sep 18 , 2023: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection, leak test, and microscopic examination of the returned device.During visual evaluation, no apparent damage or visual anomalies were observed on the exp rnd remote 400cc returned device.Additionally, the device was received painted in purple.Leak testing was performed, according to the mentor procedure, and it revealed four (4) punctures on the posterior aspect, measuring approximately 0.1 cm each.Microscopic examination was performed on the edges of the punctures, and parallel striations were found in the whole area of the four (4) punctures.Parallel striations are consistent with markings made by a sharp object perforating the tissue expander shell.Based on the information currently available, microscopic examination of the returned product indicates that the tissue expander could have been damaged during or subsequent to implantation.The product insert data sheet cautions to not allow cautery devices or sharp instruments, such as scalpels, suture needles, hypodermic needles, hemostats, adson forceps or scissors to contact the device during the implantation or other surgical procedures.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Capa activity was not required.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|