|
|
| Catalog Number |
SDC150H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
|
| Date of Event |
07/14/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a 40-year-old caucasian female patient underwent an unspecified breast surgery with a mentor artoura plus, smooth, high profile 750cc tissue expander that deflated post implantation.Deflation of the patient¿s right tissue expander was reported.As a result, the patient underwent explantation and replacement with a mentor memorygel boost breast implant 520cc gel breast prosthesis on (b)(6) 2023.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: tissue expander deflation.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On 23-aug-2023, the mentor failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On 04-dec-2023, mentor completed the investigation on the suspect medical device.Device evaluation summary: according to the information reported, a deflation occurred in a tissue expander.The product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection and microscopic examination of the returned device.During visual analysis of the returned sample, a tear was observed between the shell on the anterior view, where the insert is located.Microscopic examination was performed, and the cause of the tear could not be identified.Based on the information currently available, a product issue was identified during the investigation of the sample received.This product issue will be addressed through mentor¿s quality system.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.According to the manufacturing investigation, with consideration of the observations from evaluating the complaint device, the manufacturing records, and the existing process controls, the tear reported in the complaint could not be confirmed to be caused by manufacturing.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|