| Model Number |
ONYXNG22515UX |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Material Deformation (2976); Positioning Problem (3009)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/07/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
An attempt was made to use one onyx frontier coronary drug eluting stent to treat a moderately tortuous, moderately calcified lesion with 95% stenosis in the proximal right posterior descending (r-pda) artery.The device was inspected with no issues noted.Negative prep was performed with no issues noted.The lesion was not pre-dilated.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent.Resistance was encountered when advancing the device.Excessive force was used during delivery.It was reported that the stent failed to cross the lesion.It was detailed that direct stenting was attempted however, the stent did not cross the lesion.Upon retrieval of the stent from the vessel, the proximal stent struts were disrupted or lifted on the delivery system.The stent was successfully retrieved by removing the guide and the stent from the vessel out of the body through the 6f sheath.The patient is alive with no injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: the guide involved was a 6f launcher guide catheter and the 6f sheath was a non-medtronic device.There were no issues with the launcher guide or the non-medtronic sheath.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product analysis: the device was received for analysis.A kink was evident to the hypotube.The stent had displaced proximally on the balloon and was not positioned on the balloon between the markerbands as per specifications.The proximal stent wraps were positioned partially over the proximal markerband.Deformation was evident to the stent with proximal stent struts raised and bunched.The stent was not positioned against the distal pillow as per specification.Crimp impressions were visible on the exposed balloon surface.No deformation was evident to the distal tip.Imaget analysis: two still procedural images were provided from the account.One image shows the inflation of a device at the pda.The second image is of contrast injection into the rca.No images were provided to show the attempted delivery and withdrawal of the sent without deployment.The root cause of the reported stent deformation cannot be determined from the images provided.There is no evidence of a deformed stent on the images provided.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|