• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC CT LUCIA 621P

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC CT LUCIA 621P Back to Search Results
Model Number 621P
Medical Device Problem Code Use of Device Problem (1670)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Visual Impairment (2138)
Date of Event 08/01/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device cannot be returned therefore a proper root cause analysis could not be completed nor the reported issue confirmed.Without a proper device analysis, a definitive root cause cannot be determined at this time.It was stated by the customer that there was no damage noted to the device during preparation for use and there were no adverse effects on the patient.Based on the information provided, the risk assessment for the lucia product and based on our experience and other complaints that have already been resolved we have determined that the following factors may have cause or contributed to the damaged haptic issues are but not limited to: dwell time after preparation: the ifu recommends that after the lens is advanced into the conical section the lens must be injected immediately.Dwell scenarios where the lens sits in this position for a prolong time prior to injection may lead to stuck iol issue.Viscoelastic materials may lose their lubricity if allowed to stand too long.Misplacement of the lens.This which may occur during ovd application, the cannula may catch the edge of the lens or haptic; thus, removing the lens off the "track" which is inside the cartridge.This may also cause the lens to fold improperly.The lens should fold in a "u" shape and if it does not this will cause the lens to not eject correctly and could even cause the lens to get damaged.Inadequate application of ovd.The ifu asks for generous amount of ovd to be applied, which covers the lens and the blue cushion.If ovd is not placed on the blue cushion advancement of the plunger may be inhibited by high frictional force and appear to become stuck.Risk assessment has been reviewed within the technical file for hydrophobic lens.Risk assessment identifies failed injection or damaged haptic to possibly be caused by the lens improperly loaded such that the optic is bent, or haptics are under compression.This is seen as a reasonably foreseeable misuse, that may result in extended surgery because of damage to the lens/injector and replacement is required.This is seen as a minor severity of damage that may cause temporary injury or disability which requires no additional surgical intervention.The likelihood of occurrence is estimated to be occasional.The resulting risk is deemed acceptable.The device history records were reviewed and there were no non-conformities or deviations noted during the manufacturing of the lens that would have caused or contributed to the nature of this complaint.Additionally, our lenses are 100% inspected before they leave our manufacturing site.Therefore, we are confident that the lens was processed per standard operating procedures and inspections and met all criteria for release.
 
Event or Problem Description
After insertion/lens unfolding of a ct lucia 621, an amputated leading haptic was observed by the doctor.The lens was explanted, and a secondary lens implanted in the same surgery.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CT LUCIA 621P
Common Device Name
CT LUCIA 621P
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC
1040 s vintage ave. bld. a
ontario CA 91761
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC
1040 s vintage ave. bld. a
ontario CA 91761
Manufacturer Contact
manjaya hegde
5300 central parkway
dublin, CA 94568
9252164697
MDR Report Key17558570
Report Number3010126268-2023-00093
Device Sequence Number17404595
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier00843045102304
UDI-Public(01)00843045102304(11)230330(17)240831
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCT
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P10016-S008
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 08/16/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2024
Device Model Number621P
Device Catalogue Number003500-0056-484
Device Lot Number3S230376
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/01/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/30/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-