• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU375
Medical Device Problem Code Crack (1135)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 07/20/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts were made to obtain the missing information; however, no additional information has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) cartridge split at the tip when the doctor was attempting to implant it.Only the cartridge tip was in contact with the patient's eye.There was no patient injury and no medical or surgical intervention was required.A back up lens was used (same model and diopter).No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product was received for evaluation.Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes section d9: date returned to manufacturer: sep 5, 2023 section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: product evaluation was performed under magnification.The complaint device presented with the plunger rod overriding the lens.The plunger rod was puncturing the side of the cartridge which is consistent with excessive force being applied.The device assembly was inspected and presented with no issues.The plunger rod was additionally observed to be bent.The complaint cartridge presented with a lens stuck inside the neck.The lens was not removed from the cartridge.The complaint issue ¿cartridge tip cracked/damaged¿ could not be confirmed.However, the observed issue ¿cartridge crack¿ is similar to the complaint issue ¿cartridge tip cracked/damaged¿ and could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: as per complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.The complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key17559733
Report Number3012236936-2023-02107
Device Sequence Number3640278
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474748095
UDI-Public(01)05050474748095(17)260412
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/12/2026
Device Model NumberDIU375
Device Catalogue NumberDIU375U090
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/27/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/25/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/16/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/03/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/12/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-