|
Balt usa reference (b)(4).Note: this complaint file is being reported late as part of a corrective action following an fda inspection.After a review of historical complaint files, it was determined that for this compaint the device failed to meet its performance specifications according to the initial claim submitted by the user.For these complaints, the potential harm did not lead to a serious injury or death, however the performance specification which was failed to be met for these complaints could have led to a serious injury or death based on the initial information that was reported to balt.An evaluation of the actual complaint sample could not be performed as the device was unavailable for return.Based on the provided information, root cause could not be definitively determined.Lack of device return prevented deeper evaluation of the reported issue.Review of the lot history records did not reveal any in-process or lot-specific issue that could account for the observation.No additional complaints against lot number f220100193 has been made for the same issue.Comprehensive analysis of this failure mode has remained subject to monitoring for any unacceptable increase in trend.The submission of this report or related information to the fda, and its release by fda, does not reflect a conclusion by the party submitting this report of the fda that the report or related information is an admission that the manufacturer, their employees, or the device caused or contributed to the reportable event.
|
|
It was reported that: procedure: emergency tae for an micro catheter: sl10/stryker other coils: target/stryker, optima 3×8. after placing optima 3×8, the physician advanced coil into micro catheter.He insists that he thinks the position of fluor marker was not correct (it was displaced to the proximal side.) since when he started fluoroscopy of target lesion, he found that the implant coil had already entered the aneurysm despite he stopped advancement at the point of the fluor marker reached y connector.The procedure was completed exchanging to another optima of same size." incident report form received for this complaint indicated no patient injury was sustained.
|