• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON DICKINSON BD NANO¿ 2ND GEN PEN NEEDLE; HYPODERMIC SINGLE LUMEN NEEDLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON DICKINSON BD NANO¿ 2ND GEN PEN NEEDLE; HYPODERMIC SINGLE LUMEN NEEDLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 320883
Medical Device Problem Code Missing Information (4053)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/07/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Unknown manufacturer: there are multiple bd locations where this unspecified bd device may have been manufactured.A catalog and/or lot number could not be confirmed for this incident and without this information we are unable to determine where the device was manufactured.Therefore, bd corporate headquarters in franklin lakes, nj has been listed in sections d.3.And g.1.And the franklin lakes fda registration number has been used for the manufacture report number.D.4 lot # 9226660 was reported, however, this is not a lot number manufactured for the reported catalog # 320883.D.4.Medical device expiration date: unknown.H.4.Device manufacture date: unknown.H3.A device evaluation is anticipated but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the box of bd nano¿ 2nd gen pen needle did not have expiration date.The following was received from the initial reporter: consumer reported found in home without an experation date on box.After obtaining the lot #, ndc # and rx date on the box it was determined this box is exprired and manufactured in 2009.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation summary: no samples (including photos) were returned therefore the complaint could not be confirmed and the root cause is undetermined.Due to the batch being unknown, no dhr review can be completed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the box of bd nano¿ 2nd gen pen needle did not have expiration date.The following was received from the initial reporter: consumer reported found in home without an expiration date on box.After obtaining the lot #, ndc # and rx date on the box it was determined this box is expired and manufactured in 2009.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD NANO¿ 2ND GEN PEN NEEDLE
Common Device Name
HYPODERMIC SINGLE LUMEN NEEDLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON DICKINSON
1 becton drive
franklin lakes NJ 07417
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON DICKINSON
1 becton drive
franklin lakes NJ 07417
Manufacturer Contact
jennifer suh
5859 farinon drive
san antonio, TX 78249
8448235433
MDR Report Key17585661
Report Number2243072-2023-01480
Device Sequence Number11982002
Product Code FMI
UDI-Device Identifier10885403897511
UDI-Public(01)10885403897511
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K213478
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/24/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number320883
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/07/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/24/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/21/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/10/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-