|
C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 INTERMITTENT ROCHESTER CATHETERS; UNKNOWN INTERMITTENT CATHETERS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Fracture (1260); Scratched Material (3020)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
07/31/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that customer got 3 boxes of 12 intermittent catheters that were defective, all from the same lot.Customer stated that the end of them was curled over and were very hard.Customer also mentioned that up at the top they were shorter in the packaging, 2 inch shorter than usual.Up at the top of the catheter, the outlet part there were a large bump on it.So, insertion would be difficult because of the hard curl end.Customer request replacement for the defective product.Per follow up via pone (b)(6) 2023, customer stated that they did not use the catheters, they saw the defect before use and wanted to inform the company of the affected lots.Per notification from investigator on (b)(6) 2023, during sample evaluation it was found that the scratch found on the shaft close to the funnel of intermittent catheter.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that customer got 3 boxes of 12 intermittent catheters that were defective all the same lot.Customer stated that the end of them was curl over and were very hard.Customer also mentioned that up at the top they were shorter in the packaging, 2 inch shorter than usual.Up at the top of the catheter, the outlet part there were a large bump on it.So, insertion would be difficult because of the hard curl end.Customer request replacement for the defective product.Per follow up via pone 08jun2023, customer stated that they did not use the catheters, they saw the defect before use and wanted to inform the company of the affected lots.Per notification from investigator on 31jul2023, during sample evaluation it was found that the scratch found on the shaft close to the funnel of intermittent catheter.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported event was confirmed cause unknown.1 sample were confirmed to exhibit the reported failure.The device had not met specifications.The product was not used for patient treatment.The product caused the reported failure.Gross visual evaluation: no non-conformities were noted with the hardness at the tip of the catheter.Coude curve aligned with the coude indicator notch, some degradation due to oxidation was noted within the eyelets of catheters 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (very slight signs of oxidation within the eyelets), 6, 8, 9, as this was not reported by the customer, and it is unknown how the catheter was being stored or when the oxidation occurred a new complaint will not be created.Some scratch marks were noted on the funnel of catheters 4, 6 & 9, and a small scratch was noted on the shaft close to the funnel of catheter 10; no scratches or abnormalities were noted on the packaging.This does not meet specification which states that "materials shall be cosmetically clean, outer, and inner surfaces shall be free of dirt, foreign marks, and foreign material when viewed with the unaided eye from a distance of 6¿.Dimensional evaluation: using a french gauge, all catheters were confirmed to be 16fr.The overall length of the catheters was measured and found to be within specification: catheter 1- 15.75", catheter 2 - 15.75", catheter 3 - 15.72", catheter 4 - 15.75", catheter 5 - 15.81", catheter 6 - 15.87", catheter 7 - 15.75", catheter 8 - 16.00", catheter 9 - 16.00", catheter 10 - 15.87".A potential root cause for this failure mode could be ¿rough insertion-sleeve surface scratches hydrophilic coating or removes coating".The device history record review could not be performed without a lot number.The instructions for use were found adequate and state the following: ¿caution: this product contains natural rubber latex which may cause allergic reactions.Warnings: on latex and red rubber catheters, do not use ointments or lubricants having a petrolatum base.They will damage latex.Visually inspect the product for any imperfections or surface deterioration prior to use.Reuse and/or repackaging may create a risk of patient or user infection, compromise the structural integrity and/or essential material and design characteristics of the device, which may lead to failure, and/or to injury, illness or death of the patient.Note: after use, this product may be a potential biohazard.Handle and dispose of in accordance with accepted medical practice and applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations.Adverse reactions: urinary tract infection.Bleeding from the urethra.Irritation of the urethra.Instructions for intermittent catheters: 1.Wash your hands thoroughly with soap and water.2.Remove catheter from the pack.3.Position yourself comfortably, cleaning the opening of the urethra and surrounding area.4.Gently insert rounded end of catheter into urethra.5.When urine stops flowing, remove catheter from urethra.6.Dispose of catheter in accordance with local rules and regulations.7.Wash your hands.¿ h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : the actual/suspected device was inspected.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that customer got 3 boxes of 12 intermittent catheters that were defective all the same lot.Customer stated that the end of them was curl over and were very hard.Customer also mentioned that up at the top they were shorter in the packaging, 2 inch shorter than usual.Up at the top of the catheter, the outlet part there were a large bump on it.So, insertion would be difficult because of the hard curl end.Customer request replacement for the defective product.Per follow up via pone 08jun2023, customer stated that they did not use the catheters, they saw the defect before use and wanted to inform the company of the affected lots.Per notification from investigator on 31jul2023, during sample evaluation it was found that the scratch found on the shaft close to the funnel of catheter.Per additional information received via sample form on 20jun2023, it was reported that customer opened one box and saw a defective catheter, checked the others in the box, they were all the same, so he threw that box away.Stated that the next box was fine and then they got another box of defective catheters and stated that these were shorter than they should be.The tips were curled and the hole in the tip was much further up the catheter than it should be and they ware harder and less pliable than they should be.The outlet end had a bump on the outside.Stated that they also noticed that the print on the packaging was an off color from the usual packaging and they went through all their remaining boxes, and these were the only ones, and they were all the same lot number.Stated that they would be terribly uncomfortable to use and seem like they could hurt someone if they tried to use it, and this was the remainder of two boxes and could see the flaw through the packaging.No medical intervention was reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported event was confirmed cause unknown.1 sample were confirmed to exhibit the reported failure.The device had not met specifications.The product was not used for patient treatment.The product caused the reported failure.A potential root cause for this failure mode could be ¿rough insertion-sleeve surface scratches hydrophilic coating or removes coating".The lot number is unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.The product catalog number for this device is unknown.Therefore, bd is unable to determine the associated labeling to review.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : the actual/suspected device was inspected.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|