• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY ADAPTIS TIB SZ1 INFINITY ADAPTIS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY ADAPTIS TIB SZ1 INFINITY ADAPTIS; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 33680001
Medical Device Problem Code Migration (4003)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Discomfort (2330); Implant Pain (4561); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
Date of Event 07/27/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery of both tibial and talar components due to suspected subsidence.It was also reported that the patient continues to have pain, discomfort and swelling.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Once the investigation has been completed any additional information will be reported in a supplemental report.H3 other text : device remains implanted in patient.
 
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery of both tibial and talar components due to suspected subsidence.It was also reported that the patient continues to have pain, discomfort and swelling.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The complaint could be confirmed, since the information for evaluation matches the alleged failure.Upon further investigation of the ct scans by healthcare professionals the following was observed: the tibial component shows some radiolucence and the implant is positioned pretty far proximal.The ct scan alone cannot be taken to prove or reject loosening or migration of the implant.However, as the hcp who also has the clinical situation and further x-ray available states, that the tibial implant is loosened and subsided, i would agree, here.An infection cannot be assessed with a ct scan only.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.Based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to a patient factors issue.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INFINITY ADAPTIS TIB SZ1 INFINITY ADAPTIS
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key17606512
Report Number3010667733-2023-00473
Device Sequence Number14987243
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00889797069632
UDI-Public00889797069632
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateND
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K181557
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/13/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number33680001
Device Lot Number1686964
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/27/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/18/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/23/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/13/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/25/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexFemale
-
-