• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 BARD® X-FORCE® BALLOON DILATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 BARD® X-FORCE® BALLOON DILATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 998706
Medical Device Problem Code Material Fragmentation (1261)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/04/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient with calculi underwent ureter balloon dilation on (b)(6) 2023.Upon opening the package, the product was found to have ruptured, and there were holes in the tubing.The product was not used and was replaced with another product for dilatation.There was no impact on the patient.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient with calculi underwent ureter balloon dilation on (b)(6).Upon opening the package, the product was found to have ruptured, and there were holes in the tubing.The product was not used and was replaced with another product for dilatation.There was no impact on the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event is inconclusive as no sample was returned for evaluation.Although an exact root cause could not be determined a potential root cause could be material selection.A dhr review did not show any problems or conditions that would have contributed to the reported event.The instructions for use were found adequate and state the following: "improper handling technique can seriously weaken the stent.Exercise care.Tearing of the stent can be caused by sharp instruments.Care should be exercised when removing the stent from inner polybag so as not to cause tearing or fragmentation.The insertion of a ureteral stent should only be done by those individuals who have comprehensive training in the techniques and risks of the procedure." h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : the device was not returned.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event is inconclusive as no sample was returned for evaluation.Root cause could not be identified.Although a root cause could not be definitively identified, based on the risk documentation review, a potential root cause for this type of failure could be inappropriate package design.However, there was insufficient information to confirm this potential root cause.The device history record was reviewed and found nothing that could have caused or contributed to the reported event.The instructions for use were found adequate and state the following: "improper handling technique can seriously weaken the stent.Exercise care.Tearing of the stent can be caused by sharp instruments.Care should be exercised when removing the stent from inner polybag so as not to cause tearing or fragmentation.The insertion of a ureteral stent should only be done by those individuals who have comprehensive training in the techniques and risks of the procedure." udi format updated with available product information per gudid.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient with calculi underwent ureter balloon dilation on august 4.Upon opening the package, the product was found to have ruptured, and there were holes in the tubing.The product was not used and was replaced with another product for dilatation.There was no impact on the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BARD® X-FORCE® BALLOON DILATION CATHETER
Common Device Name
BALLOON DILATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233
8195 industrial blvd
covington GA 30014
Manufacturer Contact
xeeroy rada
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
7707846100
MDR Report Key17630678
Report Number1018233-2023-06357
Device Sequence Number17765310
Product Code EZN
UDI-Device Identifier10801741052740
UDI-Public(01)10801741052740(11)220509(17)240407(10)BMGRFM51
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K050875
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/07/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/07/2024
Device Catalogue Number998706
Device Lot NumberBMGRFM51
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/05/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/25/2023
10/07/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/28/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/31/2023
10/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured05/09/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-