| Catalog Number |
998706 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/04/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient with calculi underwent ureter balloon dilation on (b)(6) 2023.Upon opening the package, the product was found to have ruptured, and there were holes in the tubing.The product was not used and was replaced with another product for dilatation.There was no impact on the patient.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient with calculi underwent ureter balloon dilation on (b)(6).Upon opening the package, the product was found to have ruptured, and there were holes in the tubing.The product was not used and was replaced with another product for dilatation.There was no impact on the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported event is inconclusive as no sample was returned for evaluation.Although an exact root cause could not be determined a potential root cause could be material selection.A dhr review did not show any problems or conditions that would have contributed to the reported event.The instructions for use were found adequate and state the following: "improper handling technique can seriously weaken the stent.Exercise care.Tearing of the stent can be caused by sharp instruments.Care should be exercised when removing the stent from inner polybag so as not to cause tearing or fragmentation.The insertion of a ureteral stent should only be done by those individuals who have comprehensive training in the techniques and risks of the procedure." h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : the device was not returned.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported event is inconclusive as no sample was returned for evaluation.Root cause could not be identified.Although a root cause could not be definitively identified, based on the risk documentation review, a potential root cause for this type of failure could be inappropriate package design.However, there was insufficient information to confirm this potential root cause.The device history record was reviewed and found nothing that could have caused or contributed to the reported event.The instructions for use were found adequate and state the following: "improper handling technique can seriously weaken the stent.Exercise care.Tearing of the stent can be caused by sharp instruments.Care should be exercised when removing the stent from inner polybag so as not to cause tearing or fragmentation.The insertion of a ureteral stent should only be done by those individuals who have comprehensive training in the techniques and risks of the procedure." udi format updated with available product information per gudid.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient with calculi underwent ureter balloon dilation on august 4.Upon opening the package, the product was found to have ruptured, and there were holes in the tubing.The product was not used and was replaced with another product for dilatation.There was no impact on the patient.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|