|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, age, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.Section d.2b: procode is krd/hcg.Based on complaint information, the device is not available to be returned for analysis.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (30641975) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.All product rejected during manufacturing was identified as scrap and properly accounted for.Product analysis cannot be conducted as the product was not returned for analysis.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.With the information available and without the complaint product available to be returned for analysis, the reported issue documented in the complaint cannot be confirmed through functional evaluation and analysis.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.Assignment of root cause for the event remains speculative and inconclusive, based on the limited information provided and without the return of the complaint sample; however, it is possible that clinical and procedural factors, including device manipulation / interaction may have contributed to the reported failure.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
|
The healthcare professional reported that during an endovascular embolization procedure, the complaint coil, a 2mm x 2cm galaxy g3 xsft (glx120202 / 30641975) ¿deployed on its own.¿ the coil was being inserted into the microcatheter (unspecified brand) and it became prematurely deployed / detached without any action initiated on the detachment device.The coil was retrieved from the catheter.There was no adverse effect to the patient.On 28-additional information was received.The information indicated that the patient is a male.The intended procedure / target vessel is not known.The brand of the concomitant microcatheter used was unknown; but the same microcatheter was used to complete the procedure.The coil was replaced with a 2mm x 2.5cm coil (brand unspecified).The reported issue did result in an approximately 10-minute delay, whether it was clinically significant was not provided.
|