• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEGADYNE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. MEGASOFT UNIVERSAL DUAL PLUS; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEGADYNE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. MEGASOFT UNIVERSAL DUAL PLUS; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0848
Medical Device Problem Codes Human-Device Interface Problem (2949); Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Burn(s) (1757)
Date of Event 07/13/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an ortho spine procedure that after completing the procedure it was discovered that the patient had an alternate site burn about the size and thickness of a pencil eraser on their upper leg while the patient way laying prone.Upon further inspection per the ortho spine manager it would appear that the bovie pencil may not have been holstered properly and punctured through the drapes into the patients leg and activated.No degree of burn was provided to the sales rep.Treatment of the burn was not provided to the sales rep.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 8/30/2023 investigation summary: an analysis of the product could not be performed since a physical sample was not received for evaluation.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.However, if the product is received at a later date, the investigation will be updated as applicable.The device history records were reviewed and certed by external manufacturing that the manufacturing criteria were met prior to the release of the equipment.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: ¿it would appear that the bovie pencil may not have been holstered properly and punctured through the drapes into the patients¿ could you please confirm if the pencil was self-activated? is the megadyne pad currently being used in the facility.If no, why not? are there any photos of the burn (s) that you could share with us in regards to the burn? if yes, please send to (b)(4) is there any damage(s) noted on the pad? if yes, where are they and what is the description of the damage(s)? are there photos that can be shared of the pad? if yes, please send to (b)(4) how long has the account been using mega soft? does the surgeon believe there is an alleged deficiency to the pad that led to patient burn and if so why? what is the severity of the burn? (please see degrees of burns below and choose one) ¿ first degree burns are minor burns on the first layer of skin.The skin looks dry, redness, and may be swelling; no penetration or blisters ¿ second degree burn looks wet or moist.The burn site appears red, blistered, and may be swollen and painful ¿ third degree burn the burn site looks deep, whitening or blackened and charred what medical intervention was used to treat the burn (such as salve or stitches)? besides the burn, did the patient experience any adverse consequence due to the issue? are there any anticipated long-term effects from the burn or injury? what is the current status of the patient? how long did the surgical procedure last? is it possible the patient was in contact with a metal portion of the or table? how was the room set up to include patient set up and where was the pad in relation to the patient? were there liquids used in prep? what skin preparation regiment was utilized for the procedure? was urine or other fluids detected in the field after surgery? what temperature setting was used on the warming device(s)? what power levels was generator set to? was there any diminished effect of the generator noted during the surgery? what is the age of the patient? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 2/15/2024.Upon review of the information provided, it was concluded that this event does not meet the fda defined criteria for a reportable event, and is being considered not reportable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MEGASOFT UNIVERSAL DUAL PLUS
Common Device Name
ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEGADYNE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
4545 creek road
cincinnati OH 45242
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEGADYNE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
475 calle c
guaynabo 
3035526892
MDR Report Key17649906
Report Number1721194-2023-00107
Device Sequence Number15035788
Product Code GEI
UDI-Device Identifier10614559104859
UDI-Public10614559104859
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K133726
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/15/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2025
Device Catalogue Number0848
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/24/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/15/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/30/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/15/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
If action reported to FDA under 21 USC 360i(g), list
FDA-assigned Recall Number or include a statement
Z-2000-2023
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-