| Catalog Number |
EI225508 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Collapse (1099)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Intervertebral Disc Compression or Protrusion (4524)
|
| Date of Event |
08/08/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Event description: during implantation, the x-pac llif cage was expanded 2mm as verified by imaging and the surgeon was satisfied with the outcome.The first follow up visit was during (b)(6) 2023 and the patient was doing well and reported no pain.However, during a follow up visit on (b)(6) 2023, the patient reported that pain had developed.The surgeon requested an image and noted that the implanted cage had reduced in height.The surgeon indicated that the cage would need to be replaced and the revision surgery was completed on (b)(6) 2023 manufacturers narrative: the explanted cage was received at ei and a thorough visual inspection of the implant was conducted under 10x magnification.No anomalies were noted on the returned implant.All currently commercialized expanding innovations x-pac cages are designed with the same lifting and locking mechanism with differences limited to size offerings between the cage types.There has been implantation of thousands of x-pac tlif and llif cages since clearance with no reports of confirmed functional anomalies.Review of lot history records show that the subject device met all release criteria with no non-conformances noted for the manufacturing run.Based on the above investigation, the cause of the loss of height for this implant can not be attributed to a malfunction.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A x-pac lateral cage was initially implanted on the patient on (b)(6) , 2023.During implantation, the cage was raised by two clicks as verified by imaging and the doctor was satisfied with the outcome.The first follow up visit was during (b)(6) 2023 and the patient reported no pain.However, during a follow up visit on (b)(6) 2023, the patient reported pain had developed.Due to the reported pain, the doctor requested an image and noted that the implanted cage had reduced height.The doctor indicated that the cage would need to be removed and efforts were underway to schedule the patient for the removal.Ei requested to be present during the removal of the cage and that the explanted cage be made available to ei engineers.Expanding innovations ceo was present for the explantation on (b)(6) 2023 and returned the explanted device to expanding innovations engineers for further evaluation.A cage from a different supplier was used to replace the explanted ei cage.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Event description: during implantation, the x-pac llif cage was expanded 2mm as verified by imaging and the surgeon was satisfied with the outcome.The first follow up visit was during (b)(6) 2023 and the patient was doing well and reported no pain.However, during a follow up visit on (b)(6) 2023, the patient reported that pain had developed.The surgeon requested an image and noted that the implanted cage had reduced in height.The surgeon indicated that the cage would need to be replaced and the revision surgery was completed on (b)(6) 2023 manufacturers narrative: the explanted cage was received at ei and a thorough visual inspection of the implant was conducted under 10x magnification.No anomalies were noted on the returned implant.All currently commercialized expanding innovations x-pac cages are designed with the same lifting and locking mechanism with differences limited to size offerings between the cage types.There has been implantation of thousands of x-pac tlif and llif cages since clearance with no reports of confirmed functional anomalies.Review of lot history records show that the subject device met all release criteria with no non-conformances noted for the manufacturing run.Based on the above investigation, the cause of the loss of height for this implant can not be attributed to a malfunction.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
During implantation, the x-pac llif cage was expanded 2mm as verified by imaging and the surgeon was satisfied with the outcome.The first follow up visit was during (b)(6) 2023 and the patient was doing well and reported no pain.However, during a follow up visit on (b)(6) 2023, the patient reported that pain had developed.The surgeon requested an image and noted that the implanted cage had reduced in height.The surgeon indicated that the cage would need to be replaced and the revision surgery was completed on (b)(6) 2023.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|