|
As initially reported to customer relations: two stents were placed during a venagram procedure.The second stent looked mangled and kinked when placing and did not open and smooth out as normal.The physician did an angio with a 14 atlas balloon.While it did help to open and straighten, the stent was still not as open and straight as it should be.This file will capture the use of a 8fr ansel access sheath.Did any unintended section of the device remain inside the patient¿s body? no if yes, please describe.Was the patient hospitalized or was there prolonged hospitalization? no.Did the patient require any additional procedures due to this occurrence? no if yes, please describe.Did the product cause or contribute to the need for additional procedures? no if yes, please specify additional procedures and provide details.Has the complainant reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence? no.Has the complainant reported that the product caused or contributed to the adverse effects? no.Please specify adverse effects and provide details.Prefix zvt7 3.91 are images of the device or procedure available? yes.See attachments.3.92 did the patient have pre-existing conditions? no.If yes, please specify: 3.93 please describe the native state of the vessel (i.E.Was the anatomy tortuous? no was the vessel fibrotic?) n/a, tortuous, calcified, fibrotic, other.If other, please specify: 3.94 was a stent previously placed during previous procedures? no.This was the 2nd stent placed during this procedure.3.95 was the device used percutaneously? yes.3.96 where on the patient was the percutaneous access site? right femoral vein.3.97 was the access site jugular or femoral? femoral.If other, please specify: 3.98 what disease pathology was being treated? may thurner.If other, please specify 3.99 was the lesion approached via contralateral or ipsilateral? ipsilateral.3.100 was pre-dilation performed ahead of placement of the stent? no.3.101 what was the target location for the stent? right iliac vein.3.102 details of access sheath used (name, fr size, length)? 8fr ansel.3.103 was the device flushed through both flushing ports before the procedure, as per ifu? yes.3.104 details of the wire guide used (name, diameter, hyrdophyllic)? amplatz.3.105 was resistance encountered when advancing the wire guide to the target location? no.3.106 was resistance encountered when advancing the delivery system to the target location? no.3.107 if resistance was met, how did the physician address this? n/a.3.108 did the tip of the delivery system cross the target location? yes.3.109 did the user pull the handle towards the hub during deployment, per ifu? yes.3.110 did the user push the hub during deployment? no.As pin and pull was done.3.111 did the user remove slack in the delivery system before deployment, per ifu? yes.3.112 was the stent deployed smoothly / without resistance? yes.3.113 was the stent fully deployed in the patient? yes.3.114 was the stent fully deployed before removing the delivery system from the patient? yes.3.115 was post dilation performed after the placement of the stent? yes, wiht a 14 atlas balloon.3.116 was the delivery system damaged/kinked/twisted during deployment? no.3.117 what intervention (if any) was required? yes, angio with 14 atlas balloon.3.118 was the secondary intervention performed during the same procedure as the device failure or was it scheduled for another day? same.3.119 were any other defects (other than the complaint issue) observed on the delivery system prior to return (e.G.Kink)? no.No part of the delivery system will be returned.Please specify if yes.
|
|
Pma/510(k) #p200023 this file pr (b)(4) will capture the use of a 8fr ansel access sheath with the initial device placed device evaluation: user/use related complaints is considered foreseen misuse.It is unknown how the device will perform outside of instructions for use and/or labelling requirements.The user has not complied with the requirements of the ifu and/label.Trending will monitor if any future investigation is required the zvt7-35-80-16-60 device of c1930974 lot number involved in this complaint was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.Manufacturing records: prior to distribution all devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional inspection to ensure device integrity.Instructions for use/label: it should be noted that the instructions for use (ifu0091) states the following: ¿gain access at the appropriate site utilizing a 2.3mm (7.0 french) introducer sheath¿.There is evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use image review: an image was not returned for evaluation.Root cause analysis: a definitive root cause of the user not reading or following the instructions for use has been determined.From additional information provided 8fr access sheath was used with the device.As previously noted, the ifu states ¿gain access at the appropriate site utilizing a 2.3mm (7.0 french) introducer sheath¿.Confirmation of complaint: the complaint is confirmed based on customer and/or rep testimony.Summary: according to the additional information received, it is known that an 8fr access sheath was used with the device.The ifu instructs to use a 7fr access sheath.Confirmed quantity of 01 device, confirmed used.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects as a result of this occurrence.Investigation findings conclude a definitive root cause of use error was established.The user has not complied with the requirements of the ifu.From the information available, it is known that an 8fr access sheath was used with the device and not the intended 7fr size as required as per the ifu.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
|