• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 38MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 38MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 74121138
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); Radiolucent Lines (4848)
Date of Event 04/30/2008
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the plaintiff underwent a primary birmingham right hip resurfacing (bhr) on (b)(6) 2005.The patient presented persistent pain in her right hip, especially during standing and walking.Blood tests were performed and indicated no sings neither an infection nor psoas tendonitis.X-rays and ct were taken to the patient and revealed a lucency present around the peg of the femoral component of the right hip.This complication was solved by conducting a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2008.During the procedure, it was noticed that the acetabulum was in good condition and there was some movement on the femoral peg.The patient was taken to the recovery room in good condition.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: it was reported that after the patient underwent a primary birmingham right hip resurfacing (bhr), presented persistent pain in her right hip, especially during standing and walking.This complication was solved by conducting a revision surgery.During the procedure, it was noticed that the acetabulum was in good condition and there was some movement on the femoral peg.The patient was taken to the recovery room in good condition.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.A review of the historical complaints data for the devices concerned was performed using batch numbers, part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints have been identified the cup and no other similar complaints have been identified the head.This will continue to be monitored via routine trending, however it should be noted that these devices are no longer sold.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible.No further escalation actions are required.The available medical documents were reviewed.Based on the limited information provided, the clinical root cause of the femoral component loosening cannot be determined.It cannot be concluded that the reported events were associated with a malperformance of the implant.It is noted the patient underwent a second revision surgery approximately two years later.Based on the information provided, further investigation of the reported complaint cannot be carried out and remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 38MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key17684957
Report Number3005975929-2023-00131
Device Sequence Number2582796
Product Code NXT
UDI-Device Identifier03596010502766
UDI-Public3596010502766
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCA
PMA/510(K) Number
P040033
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2005
Device Explanted Year2008
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Consumer,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Other,Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/04/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/27/2009
Device Catalogue Number74121138
Device Lot Number50214
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/15/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/03/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/05/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/04/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured02/28/1995
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
ACETLR CUP HAP 46MM W/ IMPTR, LOT#:50633
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age43 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-