• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD BHR RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 56MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD BHR RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 56MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 74123156
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Pain (1994); Arthralgia (2355)
Date of Event 03/05/2018
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal reference number: case-(b)(4).H10: smith & nephew is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 c.F.R.Part 803.This report may be based upon information which smith & nephew has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, smith & nephew, or its employees, that the report constitutes an admission that the device, smith & nephew or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the plaintiff underwent a primary bhr resurfacing left hip surgery on (b)(6) 2013 and subsequently suffered from left hip pain.This adverse event was addressed by revision surgery on (b)(6) 2018 to explant the bhr resurfacing femoral head 56mm and acetabular cup hap size 56/62.A competitor¿s 64 mm allofit shell, 36 mm inner diameter highly cross-linked polyethylene elevated rim liner, taperloc stem high offset 20 x 125 and a 36 biolox delta modular head 36 +3 mm were used instead to complete revision surgery.The patient was transferred to the recovery room without issue.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section h3, h6: it was reported that the patient underwent a primary bhr resurfacing left hip surgery and subsequently suffered from left hip pain.This adverse event was addressed by revision surgery to explant the bhr resurfacing femoral head 56mm and acetabular cup hap size 56/62.A competitor¿s system was used instead to complete revision surgery.The patient was transferred to the recovery room without issue.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.A review of the historical complaints data for the alleged devices was performed using batch numbers, part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints have been identified for the head and no other similar complaints have been identified for the cup, and this failure will continue to be monitored.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, no prior applicable escalation actions were identified.The available medical documents were reviewed.With the limited information provided the clinical root cause of the reported pain cannot be confirmed.It cannot be concluded the reported pain was associated with the implant.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Based on the information provided, further investigation of the reported complaint cannot be carried out and remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Based on the limited information provided we are unable to speculate on specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.H6: health effect - clinical code.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BHR RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 56MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key17685703
Report Number3005975929-2023-00137
Device Sequence Number6179761
Product Code NXT
UDI-Device Identifier03596010552440
UDI-Public03596010552440
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCA
PMA/510(K) Number
P040033
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2013
Device Explanted Year2018
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Consumer,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/09/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/29/2015
Device Catalogue Number74123156
Device Lot Number10JW14737
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/15/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/05/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/05/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/09/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/30/2010
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
74122162/ACETABULAR CUP HAP SIZE 56/62
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age54 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-