|
E1: customer name and address = (b)(6).Postal code: (b)(6).Phone: (b)(6).E3: occupation = regulator affairs chief.G4: pma/510(k) number = k182985.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Summary of event: as reported by a distributor, the packages of two roadrunner the firm lt hydrophilic wire guides were ¿broken¿ upon arrival to the distribution facility.Photos provided by the customer show possible small holes in the sterile packages.There was no patient involvement.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the unused complaint devices was also conducted.Two complaint devices were returned to cook for investigation.One device had a punctured package below the label, however, there was no visible damage on the other device.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the dhr for the complaint lot found no relevant non-conformances.A review of complaint history found no additional relevant complaints for this lot number.The device instructions for use (ifu) states, ¿sterile if package is unopened and undamaged.Do not use the product if there is doubt as to whether the product is sterile.¿ a review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, ifu, and investigation of the returned devices suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that a cause for this incident could not be established.It is possible that the devices were damaged during shipping/handling, however this cannot be definitively determined.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.There is currently a capa investigation open to investigate this product failure.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|