• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXACTECH, INC. LGC TIBIAL FIT TRAY CEM SZ 3.5F / 3.5T; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EXACTECH, INC. LGC TIBIAL FIT TRAY CEM SZ 3.5F / 3.5T; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 02-012-45-3535
Medical Device Problem Codes Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Bone Fracture(s) (1870)
Date of Event 12/13/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
As reported via legal documentation the 69 y/o male patient had a left knee replacement on (b)(6) 2014.Approximately 8 years and 9 months after the initial procedure the patient had a left knee revision on (b)(6) 2022.The tibial component was removed, and the remaining cement was then removed from the cut surface of the tibia utilizing a saw, osteotomes and a rongeur.During removal of the tibial component, the posterior condyle of the tibia was fractured in a partial articular pattern but remained stable due to soft tissue attachments.Cement was then removed from the intramedullary canal of the tibia utilizing burr, osteotomes, reverse curettes and pituitary instruments.The fracture was provisionally held with k wires and two lag screws were placed with cancellous 4.0 screws medially and laterally to avoid the tibial component keel and stem.Once the screws were placed, the trial tibia was placed to ensure no obstructions due to the screws.The fracture was stable with this fixation and other fixation options were felt to not be worthwhile given the fracture extent.Fluoroscopy confirmed acceptable fracture alignment and hardware positioning.¿ there is no other patient demographic or medical history available.There is no device return.There are no photos or other images of the device provided.No additional information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Pending investigation.D10.Concomitants: (b)(6): 02-012-35-3509 - logic tibia ps mod insrt sz 3.5 9mm.(b)(6): 02-010-01-0235 - logic femoral ps cem left sz 3.5.(b)(6): 200-02-35 - three peg patella 35mm.(b)(6): 201-78-99 - 2pk, schanz pin 4mmx130mmx40mm thrd.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation results-the patient experienced a bone fracture during device removal, there is no indication that the device malfunctioned or caused the bone fracture; "during removal of the tibial component, the posterior condyle of the tibia was fractured in a partial articular pattern but remained stable due to soft tissue attachments." it is most likely that the method of device removal contributed to the bone fracture.It is noted in the ifu that: bone quality must be considered to ensure that the prostheses does not subside or migrate; fracture of host bone should also be considered.These devices are used for treatment not diagnosis.There is no additional information available.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LGC TIBIAL FIT TRAY CEM SZ 3.5F / 3.5T
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer (Section G)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66th ct.
gainesvilee FL 32653
Manufacturer Contact
geoff gannon
2320 nw 66th ct
gainesville, FL 32653
3523782617
MDR Report Key17700639
Report Number1038671-2023-02182
Device Sequence Number7510433
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier10885862003997
UDI-Public10885862003997
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMD
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K101981
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2014
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/29/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/04/2024
Device Catalogue Number02-012-45-3535
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/25/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/29/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/07/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/29/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/05/2014
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-