• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number SIGRADMT
Medical Device Problem Codes Failure to Fire (2610); Expulsion (2933)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/16/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
D10 concomitant product: sigradmt, tri 2.0 sigradmt rad med thk 12mm (lot#n3f0225y) h3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the device to be partially fired.Functionally, the reload was loaded into a representative handle.The interlock was overridden and the reload was applied to test media.All remaining staples were placed, and test media was transected.The reload interlock was tested and found to function properly.It was reported that the device did not fire.The reported issue was confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.It was also reported that the staples released prematurely from the device.The reported issue could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: failure to completely fire the reload will result in an incomplete cut and/or incomplete staple formation, which may result in poor hemostasis and/or leakage.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter, in a laparoscopic video-assisted thoracic surgery (vats) upper right lobe resection, during pulmonary parenchyma pulmonary resection, a pre-fire occurred in middle of firing and the device could not advance any further.When another firing was attempted, as the tissue was hard, so the firing did not advance properly.Another black reload was used to complete the case.There was no patient injury.
 
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter, in a laparoscopic video-assisted thoracic surgery (vats) upper right lobe resection, during pulmonary parenchyma pulmonary resection, a pre-fire occurred prior to the staples being fired.The device could not advance any further.When another firing was attempted, as the tissue was hard, so the firing did not advance properly.Another black reload was used with the same handle to complete the case.There was no patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: b5, g3 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRI-STAPLE 2.0
Common Device Name
STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott rd
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott rd
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key17701949
Report Number1219930-2023-03785
Device Sequence Number12442172
Product Code GDW
UDI-Device Identifier10884521543768
UDI-Public10884521543768
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K160176
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/21/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberSIGRADMT
Device Catalogue NumberSIGRADMT
Device Lot NumberN3F0225Y
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/21/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/16/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/04/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/07/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/21/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/09/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
SEE H10
Patient SexUnknown
-
-