| Catalog Number |
02-012-45-3030 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Periprosthetic fracture (4902)
|
| Date of Event |
04/13/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported via legal documentation the patient had a left knee replacement on (b)(6) 2014.Approximately 9 years and 2 months after the initial procedure the patient had a left knee revision on (b)(6) 2023.From revision operative report- "tibia fracture posterior lateral during extraction of the implants.¿ there is no other patient demographic or medical history available.There is no device return.There are no photos or other images of the device provided.No additional information is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pending investigation.D10.Concomitants: (b)(6); 02-010-01-0230 - logic femoral ps cem left sz 3.(b)(6); 02-012-44-3011 - logic tibia implant psc insert, sz 3, 11mm.(b)(6); 200-02-29 - three peg patella 29mm.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10.Additional information- d5, g2, h6 health effect - impact code & medical device problem code.H3.Investigation results: the patient experienced a bone fracture during device removal, there is no indication that the device malfunctioned or caused the bone fracture.It is most likely that the method of device removal contributed to the bone fracture.It is noted in the ifu that: bone quality must be considered to ensure that the prostheses does not subside or migrate; fracture of host bone should also be considered.These devices are used for treatment not diagnosis.There is no additional information available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay corrected information.The following sections were corrected: b2, d5, g1, h6 - health effect - clinical code, health effect - impact code, type of investigation and h11.The patient experienced a bone fracture during device removal, there is no indication that the device malfunctioned or caused the bone fracture.It is most likely that the method of device removal contributed to the bone fracture.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|