• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU600
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/23/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Section h6: health effect impact code: 4631 (to capture pt-removal and replacement).Section h3-other (81): the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.An attempt has been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was fully inserted in the patient's right eye, but was removed and replaced in the same procedure due to defect on lens.The back-up iol with same model and diopter power was implanted instead.Normal post-op course.One suture was performed which the doctor does in all his iol exchanges.Patient is happy with his vision.No other information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d9.Device available for evaluation? yes returned to manufacturer on: 9/21/2023 section h3.Device evaluated manufacturer? yes device evaluation: visual inspection revealed that the complaint handpiece was received with the plunger rod advanced to the cartridge.The handpiece was disassembled, and the assembly was inspected, no issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issue could be identified.The complaint cartridge was inspected revealing that viscoelastic residue was not dispersed throughout the length of the cartridge, suggesting that an inadequate amount of ovd/bss may have contributed to the complaint issue.Visual inspection of the complaint lens revealed that the lens was received cut in half.The lens was cleaned and, no defects on the lens could be observed.The complaint issue of ¿dc-lens damaged¿ was not confirmed.The other observed issue found during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation the complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key17703530
Report Number3012236936-2023-02313
Device Sequence Number15133277
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474749979
UDI-Public(01)05050474749979(17)241210
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/12/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/10/2024
Device Model NumberDIU600
Device Catalogue NumberDIU600U145
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/28/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/12/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/07/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/12/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/10/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight83 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-