• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INCEPTA CRT-D; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INCEPTA CRT-D; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number N160
Medical Device Problem Code High impedance (1291)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Electric Shock (2554)
Date of Event 08/31/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) recorded high out in range shock impedance values.It was noted that the patient had been evaluated, and defibrillation threshold (dft) testing had been unsuccessful in various shocking configurations.This crt-d was subsequently explanted.Due to patient anatomy, a replacement system was planned to be implanted at a future date.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) recorded high out in range shock impedance values.It was noted that the patient had been evaluated, and defibrillation threshold (dft) testing had been unsuccessful in various shocking configurations.This crt-d was subsequently explanted.Due to patient anatomy, a replacement system was planned to be implanted at a future date.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This product has not been returned to boston scientific, and as a result, laboratory analysis could not be conducted.The associated investigation determined that there was no conclusive evidence that the observed out-of-range impedance measurements were due to a product performance issue or an inadequate lead-to-device connection.However, intermittent, out-of-range shock lead impedance measurements with no conclusive evidence of a performance issue or an inadequate lead-to-device connection are likely the result of the low-energy test signal utilized for daily automatic or in-clinic commanded shock lead impedance testing.A software update was released in 2015 to further improve consistency of the impedance test results and provide the clinician with additional diagnostic tools, including programmable shock lead impedance alert limits.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report contains a correction to h6: impact codes and b5: describe event or problem.This product has not been returned to boston scientific, and as a result, laboratory analysis could not be conducted.The associated investigation determined that there was no conclusive evidence that the observed out-of-range impedance measurements were due to a product performance issue or an inadequate lead-to-device connection.However, intermittent, out-of-range shock lead impedance measurements with no conclusive evidence of a performance issue or an inadequate lead-to-device connection are likely the result of the low-energy test signal utilized for daily automatic or in-clinic commanded shock lead impedance testing.A software update was released in 2015 to further improve consistency of the impedance test results and provide the clinician with additional diagnostic tools, including programmable shock lead impedance alert limits.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) recorded high out in range shock impedance values.It was noted that the patient had been evaluated, and defibrillation threshold (dft) testing had been unsuccessful in various shocking configurations.This crt-d was subsequently explanted.Due to patient anatomy, a replacement system was planned to be implanted at a future date.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.Information was later received that a new system was implanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INCEPTA CRT-D
Common Device Name
CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key17725946
Report Number2124215-2023-49461
Device Sequence Number7148381
Product Code LWP
UDI-Device Identifier00802526480997
UDI-Public00802526480997
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P010012/S255
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2014
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/08/2016
Device Model NumberN160
Device Catalogue NumberN160
Device Lot Number969204
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/31/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/04/2023
11/06/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/11/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/09/2023
11/07/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/12/2014
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age51 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-