• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Visual Impairment (2138); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Date of Event 05/17/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a4 and a5: unknown/ asked but not available.Section h3: other 81: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a preloaded monofocal intraocular lens (iol) was explanted due to refractive surprise.The replacement iol was another different model of j&j monofocal intraocular lens.The product is being returned.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d-9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d-9: device date returned to manufacturer: 12-sept-2023.Section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received cut in half.The lens was cleaned and, no issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issue could be identified.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue could not confirmed.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.Conclusion: the complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key17726396
Report Number3012236936-2023-02230
Device Sequence Number6440586
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731851
UDI-Public(01)05050474731851(17)250924
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/18/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/24/2025
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0245
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/22/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/11/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/18/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/24/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-