• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. REDAPT SLVLS MONO STEM 240MM SZ 16 HO; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. REDAPT SLVLS MONO STEM 240MM SZ 16 HO; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROUS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 71354723
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 08/21/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after a thr surgery was performed, the patient experienced unspecified symptom due to failed greater trochanter fixation in previous surgery and subsequent stem subsidence.This adverse event was treated by a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023, but it was cancelled due to the surgeon being unwell and unavailable to perform surgery on the day, so it was booked to (b)(6) 2023 in which the stem subsidence resulted in reduced leg length and an incision was made.In addition, the redapt slvls mono stem 240mm sz 16 ho was exchanged.Patient's current health status is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event was analyzed.Although the involvement of all the devices was reported, the relationship with the investigated failure was directly associated to the redapt sleeveless monolithic stem.Therefore, no investigation is deemed for the other devices.The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The photographs were reviewed, and did not reveal any defects.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, the reported stem subsidence, reduced leg length, and subsequent revision were related to the reported failed greater trochanter fixation (zimmer).The provided undated x-rays were reviewed.Previous images were not provided for comparison to review amount of subsidence, but the images provided are consistent as there is radiolucencies around the stem and within the greater trochanter consistent with subsidence.It cannot be concluded there was a mal performance of the smith and nephew implants.The patient impact beyond the revision and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.No further clinical assessment is warranted at this time.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for total hip systems revealed that subsidence which has resulted in revision surgery and has occurred in conjunction with compaction grafting procedures usually may occur as a result of insufficient graft material, improper cement techniques, and/or varus stem alignment.This has been identified in adverse events in primary and revision surgery.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include procedural/user error, surgical complication, dislocation, dissociation, size selected and/or healing factors.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
REDAPT SLVLS MONO STEM 240MM SZ 16 HO
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key17730495
Report Number1020279-2023-01752
Device Sequence Number6440424
Product Code LZO
UDI-Device Identifier00885556579459
UDI-Public00885556579459
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryAS
PMA/510(K) Number
K211176
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Explanted Year2023
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/09/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number71354723
Device Lot Number17GTM0053D
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/21/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/06/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/12/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/09/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/19/2017
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device A
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-