|
The complaint sample was returned to viant for evaluation and the reported event is confirmed.The hemispherical acetabular reamer is dull and worn.The customer reported that after reaming with 52mm viant acetabular reamer, the 52mm implant cup would not stick when implanted.Additionally it was speculated that there was a size mismatch between the reamer and implant.It is unknown what the measurements of the 52mm pinnacle sector ii cup are as it is not manufactured by viant medical.The 52mm acetabular reamer is manufactured by viant medical.From inspection, it was found that the base of the shell (reamer cup) diameter is within the 50mm reference dimension.The remaining reaming diameter/radius is via the reaming teeth.From microscopic camera imaging of the reaming teeth, it is evident the returned acetabular reamer is dull, rounded, and nicked from repeated use.Worn reamers will become less effective over time and will required additional forces to ream correctly, prompting additional stress to be applied on the welded edges of the crossbars.These added forces can then lead to further failures.Based on the above, it is likely the 52mm acetabular reamer teeth were dull which resulted in being unable to achieve the appropriate reaming depth, subsequently leading to the reported mismatch between the viant 52mm acetabular reamer and the 52mm implant cup.The current ifu sent with this device today, man-004006 rev.A, states the following; · orthopedic medical devices are re-usable instruments used in a clinical setting for orthopedic surgery.· anticipated useful life: 60 use cycles.· repeated processing has minimal effect on these instruments.End of life is determined by wear and damage due to intended use.· visually inspect for damage and wear.Cutting edges should be free of nicks and present a continuous edge.If the instrument is damaged and worn it is considered at the end of its life and should be discarded.· when udi carrier(s) is no longer readable, the instrument is to be discarded.· viant devices should only be used by qualified personnel fully trained in the use of the surgical instruments and the relevant surgical procedures.· do not modify viant instruments in any way and handle with care at all times.Surface scratches can increase wear and the risk of corrosion, · manual surgical instruments have a limited life-span which is determined by wear or damage due to repeated intended use.When a surgical instrument reaches the end of its functional life, clean the instrument of any and all biomaterial/biohazards and safely discard the instrument in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.The device history records (dhr) were reviewed by the supplier.The acetabular reamer was manufactured on 29-nov-2019 and shipped for distribution on 30-nov-2019 (approximately 3.09 years of use).Visual, dimensional, and functional quality inspection reports found no problems.According to the dhr review, there were no ncr reports reported for this lot number.The dhr review did not identify any nonconformance.The product was manufactured according to the qualified process without deviation that could affect the fit, form, and function of the finish device.The viant risk management files were reviewed and found the reported patient effect and the observed failure are captured, assessed within the viant device history files (dhf), and has been mitigated to the lowest possible risk region.The trend analysis reveals the estimated failure rate falls within the occurrence range identified in the viant risk management files.In conclusion, the reported event is confirmed as the returned acetabular reamer is dull and worn from repeated use.The root cause is attributed to product end of life.The reamer had been used beyond its anticipated useful life.No further investigation with regard to this complaint is required.Viant will continue to monitor for trends.Updated type of investigation, investigation findings, and investigaiton conclusions based on evaluation.
|