• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE KD-655

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE KD-655 Back to Search Results
Model Number KD-655L
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding (1888)
Date of Event 07/07/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Since the literature described "dual knife j" as olympus device used in e (esd) group where adverse events occurred, we selected "kd-655l" as a representative product.The product was unknown but a representative product was chosen for processing purposes.The device was not returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is in process.The literature article is attached for additional information.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
 
Event or Problem Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature titled "treatment results at our hospital at the time of introduction of endoscopic treatment for superficial non-papillary duodenal tumors." background: endoscopic treatment for superficial non-papillary duodenal tumors (snadet) requires high technical skills due to poor operability and thin muscle layers.In addition, it is important to take measures against post-bleeding and delayed perforation due to pancreatic juice and bile exposure.Methods: at our hospital, we started submucosal dissection (esd) under general anesthesia for snadet from (b)(6) 2022, and endoscopic mucosal resection under immersion (uemr) under sedation with midazolam from (b)(6) of the same year.Up to (b)(6) 2023, six patients with esd were in group e and five patients who underwent uemr were in group u, and the treatment outcomes at the time of endoscopic treatment induction of snadet were retrospectively examined.One patient in group e underwent sedation with propofol because the lesion was localized near the pylorus ring, and one patient in group u was excluded from pathological analysis because the specimen could not be retrieved.Endoscopic procedure: esd was basically performed with a dual knife j without a traction device, and uemr used the snare master.Regarding wound closure, esd ball lesions were treated with a polyglycolic acid sheet, lesions deeper than the descending part were treated with over-the-scope clips and hemostatic clips, and uemr was performed with only hemostatic clips.Regarding adverse events, there were no cases of intraoperative/delayed perforation in either group.In one case in group e (a bulbar lesion performed under general anesthesia), post-bleeding was observed on the first postoperative day, but endoscopic hemostasis was performed, and blood transfusion was not required.Conclusion: the treatment results of esd and uemr for snadet at our hospital were good, and perforation and post-bleeding could be safely treated by appropriate wound treatment.This literature article requires 1 report.Type of adverse events and number of patients.Post-bleeding (n=1).There is no report of any olympus device malfunction in any procedure described in this study.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial and/or lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse event cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Therefore, the root cause cannot be determined.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE KD-655
Common Device Name
SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori 036-0 357
JA  036-0357
Manufacturer (Section G)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key17730875
Report Number9614641-2023-01308
Device Sequence Number6134925
Product Code KNS
UDI-Device Identifier04953170405624
UDI-Public04953170405624
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K171158
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Study,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/15/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberKD-655L
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN(LITERATURE)
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/17/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/14/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/12/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/15/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-