| Model Number |
IPN923883 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/25/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Other remarks: n/a.Corrected data: n/a.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during intubation, "the blade did not hold on the rush handle (short), no reference available on the handle".The issue was resolved by using another blade.No patient harm, desaturation, or injury.The patient status is reported as "fine".
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during intubation, "the blade did not hold on the rush handle (short), no reference available on the handle".The issue was resolved by using another blade.No patient harm, desaturation, or injury.The patient status is reported as "fine".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).The complaint sample was returned.The manufacturing site, truphatek, reported: "the customer returned two actual 004551003 rusch greenlite disp mtl mac 3 blade (new design launched blade) for investigation.The blades were returned with its original pouch.The visual examination did not reveal any obvious defects or anomalies, as the complaint blades device appears typical.Based on the dimensional inspection results, it was noted that the critical dimension 13.8 0.2 mm (total width of base of blade locking mechanism) meets the manufacturing and design/drawing release specification.The customer returned blades were reattached and disassembled multiple times with fresh handles of rusch greenled medium, and it was noted that the blade was locking on the fresh handles perfectly.There is no problem with blades for locking failure with fresh handle.The returned compliant blades are found to be fully functional when tested with fresh handles.The device history record for lot code 230325331 was reviewed and no issue that could have contributed to the reported failure was noted.The device was manufactured according to release specification.The devices were tested for 100% functional testing prior to ship to customer.Based on the dimensional inspection and functional inspection of the returned blades, it was noticed that the complaint device meets the drawing /design specification.There was no problem found on the complaint devices.Functional testing /inspection revealed that the devices are working perfectly when tested with fresh handles." teleflex will continue to monitor and trend on complaints of this nature.Other remarks: n/a.Corrected data: n/a.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|